Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 00:45 UTC

serapeum-org / cleopatra

Matplotlib utility package

PythonGPL-3.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

serapeum-org/cleopatra holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SerapeumOrganization
13 followers32 public repossince Dec 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIcleopatra0.39.025,999591 day agomatplotlibvisualization

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 119 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year119
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 60 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count60
latest_release_tag0.39.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, codecov.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
58.9/80Monthly downloads — 25,999 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescleopatra
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads25,999
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.993
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance — 152/203 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs152
open_issues4
closed_issues158
prs_merged_7d12
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d34
prs_decided_30d34
issue_closed_ratio0.975
closed_unmerged_prs51
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of serapeum-org
18.5/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginserapeum-org
public_repos32
account_age_days1,366

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 59 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescleopatra
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/serapeum-org/cleopatra
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsplots, python, visualizations
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/serapeum-org/cleopatra
docs_sitehttps://github.com/serapeum-org/cleopatra
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:cleopatra@0.39.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 13 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
47.2/55Manageable file sizes — 15/106 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes386,393
source_files_sampled106
oversized_source_files15
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
119commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
60releases
1bus factor
4open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 00:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib>=3.11pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=12.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIimageio-ffmpeg>=0.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhpc-utils>=0.1.4pyproject.toml
All dependencies 190

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 184 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIhpc-utils0.1.5direct
PyPIimageio-ffmpeg0.6.0direct
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPInumpy2.5.3direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIappnope1.0.0indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.2indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings26.1.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.10.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.3.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcleopatra0.39.0indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcmap0.7.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.18.0indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIeditorconfig0.17.1indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.5indirect
PyPIfonttools4.64.0indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhjson3.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel6.29.5indirect
PyPIipython9.17.1indirect
PyPIipython-genutils0.2.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.9indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsbeautifier2.0.3indirect
PyPIjson50.15.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-builder1.2.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-client7.4.9indirect
PyPIjupyter-console6.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-contrib-core0.4.2indirect
PyPIjupyter-contrib-nbextensions0.7.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-highlight-selected-word0.2.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-nbextensions-configurator0.6.4indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.21.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.17indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.5indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.1indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.3indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImike2.2.0indirect
PyPImistune3.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-jupyter0.26.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-macros-plugin1.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-mermaid2-plugin1.2.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-table-reader-plugin3.1.0indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.8indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInbclassic1.3.3indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.11.1indirect
PyPInbval0.11.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInotebook6.5.7indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.7indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpre-commit-hooks6.0.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.26.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.8.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-env1.7.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.2.0indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.5indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.2.0indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsuper-collections0.6.2indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.8indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIverspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.8indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.3indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.6.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.2indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.16indirect
PyPIwrapt2.4.0indirect
PyPIxyzservices2026.9.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:cleopatra@0.39.0 pulls in 13 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.