Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 23:43 UTC

setiastro / setiastrosuitepro

Seti Astro Suite Pro

PythonGPL-3.0★ 103 stars⑂ 27 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined

setiastro/setiastrosuitepro holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

setiastroPersonal account
56 followers11 public repossince Apr 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIsetiastrosuitepro1.21.4.post1-800 days agoastrophotographyastronomyimage-processingphotometry

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,667 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,667
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagV1.21.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak
How it's scored
32.6/60Stars — 103 stars
11.8/25Forks — 27 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks27
stars103
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.938

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good
How it's scored
41.4/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
17.2/30PR acceptance — 27/47 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs27
open_issues1
closed_issues64
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.985
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach — 56 followers of setiastro
12.6/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsetiastro
public_repos11
account_age_days868
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 80 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessetiastrosuitepro
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.setiastro.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://www.setiastro.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 88 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

25At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

3Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
3.2/40Legible commit history — 6 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.06
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

38Weak
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
38/55Manageable file sizes — 94/304 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,286,123
source_files_sampled304
oversized_source_files94

Key facts

103GitHub stars
9contributors
2,667commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'setiastrosuitepro' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:setiastrosuitepro@1.21.4.post1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 27 ⇿
0Stars
27Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302722025-102026-032026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 23:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities88 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 42
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy*pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy*pyproject.toml
PyPIpywavelets*pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib*pyproject.toml
PyPIplotly*pyproject.toml
PyPIexifread*pyproject.toml
PyPIlightkurve*pyproject.toml
PyPIoktopus*pyproject.toml
PyPIPyOpenGL*pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas*pyproject.toml
PyPItifffile*pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow*pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests*pyproject.toml
PyPIastroquery*pyproject.toml
PyPIlz4*pyproject.toml
PyPIzstandard*pyproject.toml
PyPIimagecodecs*pyproject.toml
PyPIastropy*pyproject.toml
PyPIphotutils*pyproject.toml
PyPIsep*pyproject.toml
PyPIreproject*pyproject.toml
PyPItzlocal*pyproject.toml
PyPIskyfield*pyproject.toml
PyPIjplephem*pyproject.toml
PyPIGaiaXPy^2.1.4pyproject.toml
PyPInumba*pyproject.toml
PyPIonnx*pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime-gpu—pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime-directml>=1.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime>=1.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPIxisf*pyproject.toml
PyPIrawpy>=0.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIimageio*pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdfium2*pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz*pyproject.toml
PyPIpy-cpuinfo*pyproject.toml
PyPIPyQt6*pyproject.toml
PyPIpyqtgraph*pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil*pyproject.toml
PyPInvidia-ml-py*pyproject.toml
PyPIopencv-python-headless*pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-image*pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with setiastro/setiastrosuitepro. Read them side by side →

94astropy/photutilsAstropy package for source detection and photometry. Maintainer: @larrybradleyExceptional86PyAutoLabs/PyAutoGalaxyPyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & MorphologyExcellent83spacetelescope/stsynphot_refactorSynthetic photometry using Astropy for HST and JWSTExcellent63theatrus/seizaRust astronomical plate solverModerate78isbeorn/ninaN.I.N.A. (Nighttime Imaging 'N' Astronomy) - Advanced astrophotography sequencing software for Windows, supporting full automation of imaging sessions.Good73nightwatch-astro/xisf-headerRead and write XISF image-file headers: FITS keyword extraction + header CRUD. Header-only Rust crate (quick-xml, thiserror, optional serde).Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.