Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-02 23:56 UTC

shinyorg / pushextensions

C#No license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

shinyorg/pushextensions holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Shiny.NETOrganization

185 followers38 public repossince Mar 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

50Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.2/36	Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
10.3/18	Commit volume — 13 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully

Inputs used

commits_last_year	13
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	6

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 1 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1
stars	0
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.929

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30	PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.3/25	Owner reach — 185 followers of shinyorg
23.6/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	185
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	shinyorg
public_repos	38
account_age_days	2,720

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0/7.5	Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	32,982

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — samples/AotSmokeTest/AotSmokeTest.csproj, samples/Push.Api/Push.Api.csproj, src/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	samples/AotSmokeTest/AotSmokeTest.csproj, samples/Push.Api/Push.Api.csproj, src/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb.csproj, src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj, tests/Shiny.Extensions.Push.Tests/Shiny.Extensions.Push.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/75 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	21,659
source_files_sampled	75
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars

2contributors

13commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

0open issues

—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10

3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-02 23:56 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
0	Maintained	project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
NuGet	Shiny.DocumentDb	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb/Shiny.Extensions.Push.DocumentDb.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Http	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Options	`—`	src/Shiny.Extensions.Push/Shiny.Extensions.Push.csproj

All dependencies 15

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions	`—`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics	`—`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Http	`—`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions	`—`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Options	`—`	direct
NuGet	Shiny.DocumentDb	`—`	direct
NuGet	coverlet.collector	`—`	indirect
NuGet	GitHubActionsTestLogger	`—`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi	`—`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testing	`—`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`—`	indirect
NuGet	Scalar.AspNetCore	`—`	indirect
NuGet	Shiny.DocumentDb.Sqlite	`—`	indirect
NuGet	xunit	`—`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.