Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 18:33 UTC

sighupio / gatekeeper-policy-manager

A simple to use web-based OPA Gatekeeper policy manager

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 328 stars⑂ 38 forkssince Apr 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

#gatekeeper #kubernetes #opa #fury #rego #policies #k8s #kustomize #dashboard #ui #web #webapp

sighupio/gatekeeper-policy-manager holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SIGHUPOrganization

62 followers56 public repossince Jun 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/sighupio/gatekeeper-policy-manager	v1.1.2	-	54	75 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
20.8/36	Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 425 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	425
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	30

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 56 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 34 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~42.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	56
latest_release_tag	v2.1.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	34
mean_days_between_releases	42.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate

How it's scored

40.8/60	Stars — 328 stars
13.1/25	Forks — 38 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	38
stars	328
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	20
top_contributor_share	0.836

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22/30	PR acceptance — 1,058/1,444 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,058
open_issues	0
closed_issues	69
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	386
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.9/25	Owner reach — 62 followers of sighupio
24.8/25	Track record — 56 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	62
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	sighupio
public_repos	56
account_age_days	3,414

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 75 days ago
20/20	Version history — 54 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/sighupio/gatekeeper-policy-manager
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	75

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://sighup.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	gatekeeper, kubernetes, opa, fury, rego, policies, k8s, kustomize, dashboard, ui, web, webapp
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://sighup.io
docs_site	https://sighup.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	3.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	31
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	121
unassessed_packages	1
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 3, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 121 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 87 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.956
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.09

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
53.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/44 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	82,473
source_files_sampled	44
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

328GitHub stars

20contributors

425commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

56releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 38 ⇿

0Stars

38Forks

49Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 4Patch 18

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10

3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 18:33 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3	`v3.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4	`v4.1.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/securecookie	`v1.1.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/sessions	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/labstack/echo-contrib	`v0.50.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.15.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.6`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.37.0`	go.mod
Go	k8s.io/api	`v0.37.0`	go.mod
Go	k8s.io/apimachinery	`v0.37.0`	go.mod
Go	k8s.io/client-go	`v0.37.0`	go.mod
Go	sigs.k8s.io/yaml	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
npm	alpinejs	`3.17.3`	package.json

All dependencies 122

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 107 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	direct
Go	github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3	`v3.21.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4	`v4.1.5`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/securecookie	`v1.1.2`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/sessions	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/labstack/echo-contrib	`v0.50.1`	direct
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.15.4`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	direct
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.6`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.37.0`	direct
Go	k8s.io/api	`v0.37.0`	direct
Go	k8s.io/apimachinery	`v0.37.0`	direct
Go	k8s.io/client-go	`v0.37.0`	direct
Go	sigs.k8s.io/yaml	`v1.6.0`	direct
npm	alpinejs	`3.17.3`	direct
Go	github.com/beorn7/perks	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2	`v2.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3	`v3.13.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.10.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2	`v2.9.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/cmdutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/conv	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/fileutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/jsonutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/loading	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/mangling	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/netutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/pools	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/stringutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/typeutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/yamlutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2	`v2.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/gnostic-models	`v0.7.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/context	`v1.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/labstack/gommon	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/concurrent	`v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/reflect2	`v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31ee`	indirect
Go	github.com/munnerz/goautoneg	`v0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.24.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_model	`v0.6.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/common	`v0.70.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.21.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero	`v0.12.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/subosito/gotenv	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/fasttemplate	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/x448/float16	`v0.8.4`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v2	`v2.4.4`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.5`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.45.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`v0.15.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996af`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4	`v4.13.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/inf.v0	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/klog/v2	`v2.140.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/kube-openapi	`v0.0.0-20260721132016-d427ff9ee9ad`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/utils	`v0.0.0-20260707023825-cf1189d6abe3`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/json	`v0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/randfill	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6	`v6.4.2`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`1.63.0`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.63.0`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	beaker	`1.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`7.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.6.17`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`3.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	flask-cors	`6.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	flask-pyoidc	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	future	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth	`2.49.2`	indirect
PyPI	gunicorn	`25.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-resources	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	itsdangerous	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	kubernetes	`35.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mako	`1.3.12`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	oauthlib	`3.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	oic	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycryptodomex	`3.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwkest	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests-oauthlib	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rsa	`4.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 121 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect	high	6	`50.0.0`
urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect	high	6	`2.8.0`
mako	`1.3.12`	indirect	moderate	2	`1.4.2`
oauthlib	`3.3.1`	indirect	moderate	4	`4.0.0`
werkzeug	`3.1.8`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.1.9`
beaker	`1.13.0`	indirect	unknown	1	—
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	indirect	unknown	4	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	indirect	unknown	5	`1.27.2`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.41.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records