Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 11:57 UTC

sillsdev / machine

Machine is a natural language processing library for .NET that is focused on providing tools for processing resource-poor languages.

C#MIT★ 29 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Jan 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

sillsdev/machine holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SIL LSDevOrganization
185 followers309 public repossince Oct 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetSIL.Machine.Tool3.9.3-9917 days ago
NuGetSIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool3.9.3-9917 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume — 88 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year88
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 64 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count64
latest_release_tagv3.9.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases23.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars — 29 stars
10/25Forks — 17 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks17
stars29
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.3/80Total downloads — 87,404 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSIL.Machine.Tool, SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads87,404
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.734
How it's scored
38.6/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance — 290/332 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs290
open_issues12
closed_issues138
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio0.92
closed_unmerged_prs42
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.3/25Owner reach — 185 followers of sillsdev
25/25Track record — 309 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers185
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsillsdev
public_repos309
account_age_days5,460

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 99 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSIL.Machine.Tool, SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslanguage-translation, machine-translation, natural-language-processing
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 24 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 83 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.838
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Plugin/SIL.Machine.Plugin.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifestssrc/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Plugin/SIL.Machine.Plugin.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Tokenization.SentencePiece/SIL.Machine.Tokenization.SentencePiece.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Tool/SIL.Machine.Tool.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Translation.TensorFlow/SIL.Machine.Translation.TensorFlow.csproj, src/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot.csproj, src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj, tests/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tests/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tests.csproj, tests/SIL.Machine.Tests/SIL.Machine.Tests.csproj, tests/SIL.Machine.Tokenization.SentencePiece.Tests/SIL.Machine.Tokenization.SentencePiece.Tests.csproj, tests/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot.Tests/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 8/711 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes155,125
source_files_sampled711
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

29GitHub stars
13contributors
88commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
64releases
1bus factor
12open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 17 ⇿
0Stars
17Forks
51Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04812161612013-092019-102025-11
Major 1Minor 7Patch 33

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 11:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetManyConsole2.0.1src/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool/SIL.Machine.Morphology.HermitCrab.Tool.csproj
NuGetMcMaster.NETCore.Plugins2.0.0src/SIL.Machine.Plugin/SIL.Machine.Plugin.csproj
NuGetMcMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils5.0.1src/SIL.Machine.Tool/SIL.Machine.Tool.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet16.3.0src/SIL.Machine.Tool/SIL.Machine.Tool.csproj
NuGetTensorFlow.NET0.60.5src/SIL.Machine.Translation.TensorFlow/SIL.Machine.Translation.TensorFlow.csproj
NuGetThot3.5.0src/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot/SIL.Machine.Translation.Thot.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetNito.AsyncEx5.1.2src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetPCRE.NET1.4.0src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetSandwych.QuickGraph.Core1.0.0src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetSIL.Scripture17.0.0src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.3src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Dataflow10.0.3src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetCaseExtensions1.1.0src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0src/SIL.Machine/SIL.Machine.csproj
All dependencies 24

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCaseExtensions1.1.0direct
NuGetManyConsole2.0.1direct
NuGetMcMaster.Extensions.CommandLineUtils5.0.1direct
NuGetMcMaster.NETCore.Plugins2.0.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNito.AsyncEx5.1.2direct
NuGetPCRE.NET1.4.0direct
NuGetSandwych.QuickGraph.Core1.0.0direct
NuGetSIL.Scripture17.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.3direct
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Dataflow10.0.3direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0direct
NuGetTensorFlow.NET0.60.5direct
NuGetThot3.5.0direct
NuGetYamlDotNet16.3.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4indirect
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild6.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1indirect
NuGetNSubstitute5.3.0indirect
NuGetNSubstitute.Analyzers.CSharp1.0.17indirect
NuGetNUnit4.4.0indirect
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.11.2indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.1.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Async7.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 24 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.