Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-31 12:50 UTC

simplify9 / SW-Mtm-api

Multi-tenant user and tenant management microservice issuing JWTs for SimplyWorks applications

C#MIT★ 7 stars⑂ 1 forksince Aug 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined
#api#dotnet#nuget#open-source#simplify9

simplify9/SW-Mtm-api holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Simplify9Organization · verified domain
14 followers27 public repossince Oct 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetSimplyWorks.Mtm.Sdk8.0.3-1150 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

65Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume — 30 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 15 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~36.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tag8.0.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases36.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

13Critical
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars7
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
51/80Total downloads — 81,489 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSimplyWorks.Mtm.Sdk
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads81,489
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.298

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
25.1/30PR acceptance — 103/123 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs103
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

81Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
8.5/25Owner reach — 14 followers of simplify9
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginsimplify9
public_repos27
account_age_days4,695

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 115 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSimplyWorks.Mtm.Sdk
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, dotnet, nuget, open-source, simplify9
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 16 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.1/40Legible commit history — 47 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.47
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

49Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — SW.Mtm.Api/SW.Mtm.Api.csproj, SW.Mtm.MsSql/SW.Mtm.MsSql.csproj, SW.Mtm.MySql/SW.Mtm.MySql.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifestsSW.Mtm.Api/SW.Mtm.Api.csproj, SW.Mtm.MsSql/SW.Mtm.MsSql.csproj, SW.Mtm.MySql/SW.Mtm.MySql.csproj, SW.Mtm.PgSql/SW.Mtm.PgSql.csproj, SW.Mtm.Sdk/SW.Mtm.Sdk.csproj, SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj, SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/91 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes29,873
source_files_sampled91
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
12contributors
30commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
2bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-31 12:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5CI-Tests7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluentValidation10.3.4SW.Mtm.Api/SW.Mtm.Api.csproj
NuGetOtp.NET1.2.2SW.Mtm.Api/SW.Mtm.Api.csproj
NuGetSimplyWorks.EfCoreExtensions8.1.2SW.Mtm.Api/SW.Mtm.Api.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer8.0.24SW.Mtm.MsSql/SW.Mtm.MsSql.csproj
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql8.0.3SW.Mtm.MySql/SW.Mtm.MySql.csproj
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL8.0.11SW.Mtm.PgSql/SW.Mtm.PgSql.csproj
NuGetSimplyWorks.HttpExtensions8.1.2SW.Mtm.Sdk/SW.Mtm.Sdk.csproj
NuGetFluentValidation10.3.4SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.11.0SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.7SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.7SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.1.0SW.Mtm.UnitTests/SW.Mtm.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design8.0.24SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
NuGetEFCore.NamingConventions8.0.3SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
NuGetSimplyWorks.CqApi8.2.6SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer8.0.24SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
NuGetSimplyWorks.Logger.ElasticSearch8.1.1SW.Mtm.Web/SW.Mtm.Web.csproj
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.1.0direct
NuGetEFCore.NamingConventions8.0.3direct
NuGetFluentValidation10.3.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer8.0.24direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design8.0.24direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer8.0.24direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.11.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.7direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.7direct
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL8.0.11direct
NuGetOtp.NET1.2.2direct
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql8.0.3direct
NuGetSimplyWorks.CqApi8.2.6direct
NuGetSimplyWorks.EfCoreExtensions8.1.2direct
NuGetSimplyWorks.HttpExtensions8.1.2direct
NuGetSimplyWorks.Logger.ElasticSearch8.1.1direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 16 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with simplify9/SW-Mtm-api. Read them side by side →

95bitwarden/serverBitwarden infrastructure/backend (API, database, Docker, etc).Exceptional94dotnet/docfxStatic site generator for .NET API documentation.Exceptional94MonoGame/MonoGameOne framework for creating powerful cross-platform games.Exceptional98microsoft/kiotaOpenAPI based HTTP Client code generatorExceptional98swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional95NuGet/NuGetGalleryNuGet Gallery is a package repository that powers https://www.nuget.org. Use this repo for reporting NuGet.org issues.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.