Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 11:26 UTC

siphon-project / siphon-sip

SIPhon — High-performance SIP proxy, B2BUA, and IMS platform with Python scripting

RustMIT★ 54 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

siphon-project/siphon-sip holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SIPhon projectOrganization
5 followers8 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iosiphon-sip1.15.2125370 days agob2buaimsproxysipvoipnetwork-programming
PyPIsiphon-sip1.15.21,862350 days agob2buaimsmockproxysiptestingvoip

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.8/36Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,176 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,176
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year30
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv1.15.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28/60Stars — 54 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars54
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44/80Monthly downloads — 1,987 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessiphon-sip, siphon-sip
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads554
monthly_downloads1,987
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
32.9/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 679/703 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs679
open_issues5
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d31
prs_decided_7d31
prs_merged_30d59
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.783
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of siphon-project
8.2/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsiphon-project
public_repos8
account_age_days228

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 37 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessiphon-sip, siphon-sip
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://siphon-sip.org/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://siphon-sip.org/
docs_sitehttps://siphon-sip.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, siphon-bin/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml
11/11Static type checking — examples/remote_control/tsconfig.json, sdk/siphon_sdk/py.typed, siphon-control-sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexamples/remote_control/tsconfig.json, sdk/siphon_sdk/py.typed, siphon-control-sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, siphon-bin/Cargo.toml, siphon-control-sdk/Cargo.toml, siphon-control-sdk/siphon-control-client/Cargo.toml, siphon-control-sdk/siphon-control-proto/Cargo.toml, siphon-control-sdk/siphon-control/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50.6/55Manageable file sizes — 85/1,053 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes590,295
source_files_sampled1,053
oversized_source_files85
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — cookbook, examples
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

54GitHub stars
1contributors
1,176commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
5open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'siphon-bin' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:siphon-sip@1.15.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468822026-052026-072026-09
Major 1Minor 8Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 11:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests14 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 63
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotokio1.50Cargo.toml
crates.ioflume0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpus1Cargo.toml
crates.ionom8Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.11Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap2.13Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3-async-runtimes0.29Cargo.toml
crates.iohickory-resolver0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.6Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pki-types1Cargo.toml
crates.iowebpki-roots1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.29Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iosiphon-rtp-proto0.15Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-sctp0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-saphyr2.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_path_to_error0.1.20Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iop2560.13Cargo.toml
crates.iox509-cert0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.23Cargo.toml
crates.iomd50.8Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.11Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.22Cargo.toml
crates.iogetrandom0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioipnet2Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify8Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-appender0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioredis1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-postgres0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioprometheus0.14Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8.8Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http0.7.0Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-embed8Cargo.toml
crates.iomime_guess2Cargo.toml
crates.iorasn0.29Cargo.toml
crates.iorasn-derive0.29Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioquick-xml0.42Cargo.toml
crates.iouppsala0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.iosiphon-sip—siphon-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iosiphon-smpp—siphon-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iosiphon-http—siphon-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iosiphon-sigtran—siphon-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4siphon-bin/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.