Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 06:38 UTC

sky-uk / feed

Nginx based Kubernetes ingress controller for AWS

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 57 stars⑂ 9 forkssince May 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

sky-uk/feed holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 974 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sky UK LtdOrganization
2,576 followers192 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sky-uk/feedv1.14.2-422664 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 974 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push974
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases50 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,150 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~125.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tagv6.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,150
mean_days_between_releases125.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.4/60Stars57 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
9.1/15Watchers45 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars57
watchers45
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicestravis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 27% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.269
How it's scored
26.2/42Issue resolution62% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance234/244 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs234
open_issues6
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.625
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
24.5/25Owner reach2,576 followers of sky-uk
25/25Track record192 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,576
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsky-uk
public_repos192
account_age_days5,345
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 2,664 days ago
20/20Version history42 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/sky-uk/feed
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,664

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsingress
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: github.com/sirupsen/logrus 1.9.0 (high 7.5), github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go 1.44.65 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
31.7/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,680 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories43
affected_packages7
assessed_packages62
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 62 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes1/60 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes78,262
source_files_sampled60
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

57GitHub stars
23contributors
0commits, last 12 months
974days since last push
50releases
2bus factor
6open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
34Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812017-062018-112020-03
Major 2Minor 12Patch 20

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 06:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.65go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/onrik/logrusv0.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.12.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sethgrid/pesterv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.24.3go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.24.3go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.24.3go.mod
All dependencies 62

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.44.65direct
Gogithub.com/golang/mock1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierror1.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/onrik/logrus0.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v22.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.12.2direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/sethgrid/pester1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.24.3direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.24.3direct
Gok8s.io/client-go0.24.3direct
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/objx0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjson1.14.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220728211354-c7608f3a8462indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220722155238-128564f6959cindirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20220728004956-3c1f35247d10indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.0.0-20220722155259-a9ba230a4035indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.3.7indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220722155302-e5dcc9cfc0b9indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.70.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220627174259-011e075b9cb8indirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220728103510-ee6ede2d64edindirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20220713155537-f223a00ba0e2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.2.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 62 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.0directhigh21.9.3
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220728211354-c7608f3a8462indirecthigh3112.0.2
golang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220722155238-128564f6959cindirecthigh20.27.0
golang.org/x/text0.3.7indirecthigh30.39.0
google.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirecthigh21.33.0
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.44.65directunknown2
golang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20220728004956-3c1f35247d10indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.