Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 12:57 UTC

sky1core / regobrick

GoApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗

sky1core/regobrick holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (59/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 55 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sky1corePersonal account
4 followers17 public repossince May 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sky1core/regobrickv0.8.0-1455 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 55 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume21 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push55
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 55 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release55
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
5/25Owner reach4 followers of sky1core
21.1/25Track record17 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsky1core
public_repos17
account_age_days4,146
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 55 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/sky1core/regobrick
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish55

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories17
affected_packages5
assessed_packages97
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 97 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.5/40Legible commit history22 of 35 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.629
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod, tests/integration/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 35
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, tests/integration/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.4/55Manageable file sizes1/34 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes66,632
source_files_sampled34
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
21commits, last 12 months
55days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 12:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/quagmt/udecimalv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 94 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/quagmt/udecimalv1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/agnivade/levenshteinv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ansitermv0.0.0-20210617225240-d185dfc1b5a1indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefs/pkgv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/logv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/platformsv1.0.0-rc.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/dockercfgv0.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-unitsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ini/iniv1.67.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/globv0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.5indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagicv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsigv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsig-secp256k1v1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httpccv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprc/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v3v3.0.12indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/optionv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/option/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.8.10indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.32indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-specv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/go-archivev0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/patternmatcherv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/sequentialv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/userv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/usernsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/termv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aecv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20210106213030-5aafc221ea8cindirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.66.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metricsv0.0.0-20250401214520-65e299d6c5c9indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.25.6indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4-0.20230606125235-dd1b4c2e81afindirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tchap/go-patricia/v2v2.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-gov0.40.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjsonv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2v2.5.31indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/yashtewari/glob-intersectionv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.63.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.2indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.39.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.10indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 97 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/docker/dockerv28.5.1+incompatibleindirecthigh92.0.0-beta.14
github.com/moby/go-archivev0.1.0indirecthigh20.3.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.44.0indirectlow11.45.0
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.1indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown40.56.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.