Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-07 22:32 UTC

skybrud / Skybrud.Essentials

Library with common purpose functionality for working with .NET.

C#MIT★ 13 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Oct 2016View on GitHub ↗

skybrud/Skybrud.Essentials holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Limbo (formerly Skybrud)Organization · verified domain
5 followers87 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSkybrud.Essentials1.1.69-8240 days agoskybrudlimboessentialsjsonxmldatetimecalendariso8601rfc822rfc2822reflectionparsing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
15.8/18Commit volume — 56 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year56
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 85 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~33.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count85
latest_release_tagv1.1.69
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases33.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars13
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
66.1/80Total downloads — 2,274,507 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSkybrud.Essentials
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads2,274,507
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
38.5/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
18.8/30PR acceptance — 5/8 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues4
closed_issues44
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.917
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of skybrud
25/25Track record — 87 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginskybrud
public_repos87
account_age_days5,224

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history — 82 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSkybrud.Essentials
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://packages.skybrud.dk/skybrud.essentials/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsskybrud, skybrud-essentials, essentials, json, time, xml, security, enums, csharp, dotnet, net-standard, netstandard, netframework, net5, net6, iso8601, parsing, rfc2822, rfc822
has_wikino
homepagehttps://packages.skybrud.dk/skybrud.essentials/
docs_sitehttps://packages.skybrud.dk/skybrud.essentials/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: Newtonsoft.Json 9.0.1 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,568 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.6/40Legible commit history — 33 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.33
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj, src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj, src/UnitTestProject1/UnitTestProject1.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj, src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj, src/UnitTestProject1/UnitTestProject1.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 4/402 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes100,634
source_files_sampled402
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

13GitHub stars
1contributors
56commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
85releases
1bus factor
4open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
57Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512017-062020-092023-12
Major 0Minor 1Patch 56

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-07 22:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSystem.Xml.XPath.XDocument4.3.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetSystem.Xml.XPath.XDocument4.3.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions6.0.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetSystem.Xml.XPath.XDocument4.3.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions6.0.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetNullable1.3.1src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json9.0.1src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2022.1.0src/Skybrud.Essentials/Skybrud.Essentials.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration6.0.0src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.3.2src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.10src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.10src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.1.2src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages9.0.5src/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
All dependencies 12

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.1.2direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2022.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration6.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions6.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.3.2direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.10direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.10direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json9.0.1direct
NuGetNullable1.3.1direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages9.0.5direct
NuGetSystem.Xml.XPath.XDocument4.3.0direct
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json9.0.1directhigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.