Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 05:02 UTC

slowli / term-transcript

Snapshot testing for CLI / REPL applications, in a fun way

RustApache-2.0★ 32 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Apr 2021View on GitHub ↗

slowli/term-transcript holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alex OstrovskiPersonal account
116 followers48 public repossince Nov 2014@matter-labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume34 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases7 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~208.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases208.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
24.2/60Stars32 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars32
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 90% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.901
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
11.8/30PR acceptance106/270 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs106
open_issues1
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.941
closed_unmerged_prs164
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.9/25Owner reach116 followers of slowli
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers116
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginslowli
public_repos48
account_age_days4,271
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://slowli.github.io/term-transcript/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssnapshot-tests, svg, terminal
has_wikino
homepagehttps://slowli.github.io/term-transcript/
docs_sitehttps://slowli.github.io/term-transcript/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/58 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes42,407
source_files_sampled58
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

32GitHub stars
2contributors
34commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 05:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 205 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioalloc-no-stdlib2.0.4indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.6indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103indirect
crates.ioassert_matches1.5.0indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobit-set0.8.0indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.8.0indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.10.0indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobrotli8.0.2indirect
crates.iobrotli-decompressor5.0.0indirect
crates.iobytecount0.6.9indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.3indirect
crates.iocompile-fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.16indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.6indirect
crates.iodarling0.20.10indirect
crates.iodarling_core0.20.10indirect
crates.iodarling_macro0.20.10indirect
crates.ioderive_builder0.20.2indirect
crates.ioderive_builder_core0.20.2indirect
crates.ioderive_builder_macro0.20.2indirect
crates.iodiff0.1.13indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.5indirect
crates.iodoc-comment0.3.4indirect
crates.iodowncast-rs1.2.1indirect
crates.ioeither1.13.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.1indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.10indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofiledescriptor0.8.3indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofont-subset0.1.0indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.1indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetopts0.2.24indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.2indirect
crates.iohandlebars6.4.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.0indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohumantime2.4.0indirect
crates.ioicu_collections1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid_transform1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid_transform_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties1.5.1indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider_macros1.5.0indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.2.1indirect
crates.ioident_case1.0.1indirect
crates.ioidna1.0.3indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioioctl-rs0.1.6indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.1indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.14indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.183indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolitemap0.7.4indirect
crates.iolog0.4.22indirect
crates.iomatchers0.2.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.6.5indirect
crates.ionix0.25.1indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ionum-modular0.6.1indirect
crates.ionum-order1.2.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.20.2indirect
crates.ioos_pipe1.2.3indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1indirect
crates.iopest2.7.15indirect
crates.iopest_derive2.7.15indirect
crates.iopest_generator2.7.15indirect
crates.iopest_meta2.7.15indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.15indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioportable-pty0.8.1indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.iopredicates2.1.5indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.9indirect
crates.iopretty_assertions1.4.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioproptest1.11.0indirect
crates.iopulldown-cmark0.9.6indirect
crates.ioquick-error1.2.3indirect
crates.ioquick-xml0.41.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ior-efi5.2.0indirect
crates.iorand0.9.4indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.4.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorusty-fork0.3.1indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.24indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.8indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.ioserial0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-core0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-unix0.4.0indirect
crates.ioserial-windows0.4.0indirect
crates.iosha20.10.8indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.ioshared_library0.1.9indirect
crates.ioshell-words1.1.0indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.13.2indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.13.1indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.ioterminal_size0.4.4indirect
crates.iotermios0.2.2indirect
crates.iotest-casing0.2.0indirect
crates.iotest-casing-macro0.2.0indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.9indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.9indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.8indirect
crates.iotinystr0.7.6indirect
crates.iotoml0.7.8indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.3+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.9indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.19.15indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.44indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-capture0.1.0indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23indirect
crates.iotracing-tunnel0.1.0indirect
crates.iotypenum1.17.0indirect
crates.ioucd-trie0.1.7indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicase2.8.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.14indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iourl2.5.4indirect
crates.ioutf16_iter1.0.5indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.0indirect
crates.ioversion-sync0.9.5indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.14.2+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow0.5.40indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.0indirect
crates.iowinreg0.10.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rt0.39.0indirect
crates.iowrite161.0.0indirect
crates.iowriteable0.5.5indirect
crates.ioyansi1.0.1indirect
crates.ioyoke0.7.5indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.7.5indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.27indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.27indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.5indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.5indirect
crates.iozerovec0.10.4indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.10.3indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.19indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.