Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 05:05 UTC

slowli / test-casing

Parameterized Rust tests with procedural code generation

RustApache-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗

slowli/test-casing holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (62/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alex OstrovskiPersonal account
116 followers48 public repossince Nov 2014@matter-labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iotest-casing0.2.09,59460 days agocasedecoratorparameterizedtesting
crates.iotest-casing-macro0.2.09,69460 days agocasedecoratorparameterizedtesting

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
9.4/18Commit volume10 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year10
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~228.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases228.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
57.1/80Monthly downloads19,288 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestest-casing, test-casing-macro
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads374,744
monthly_downloads19,288
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 78% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.775
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
7.8/30PR acceptance34/131 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs97
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.9/25Owner reach116 followers of slowli
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers116
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginslowli
public_repos48
account_age_days4,271
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history6 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestest-casing, test-casing-macro
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/test-casing
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsparameterized-tests, testing
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/test-casing
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes20,187
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
10commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 05:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests10 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotracinglib/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriberlib/Cargo.toml
crates.iotest-casing-macrolib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquotemacro/Cargo.toml
crates.iosynmacro/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 131

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106direct
crates.ioquote1.0.46direct
crates.iosyn2.0.118direct
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102indirect
crates.ioassert_matches1.5.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.6.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.iochacha200.10.0indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.0indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.5indirect
crates.iodoc-comment0.3.4indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.1indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.1indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.2indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.2indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.0indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_collections1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid_transform1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locid_transform_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties1.5.1indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider1.5.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider_macros1.5.0indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.2.1indirect
crates.ioidna1.0.3indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.14indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.177indirect
crates.iolitemap0.7.4indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomatchers0.2.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.3indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.9indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.iopulldown-cmark0.9.6indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.10.2indirect
crates.iorand_core0.10.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.18indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.24indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.134indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.8indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.13.2indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.0indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.13.1indirect
crates.iotarget-triple1.0.0indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.4.1indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.9indirect
crates.iotinystr0.7.6indirect
crates.iotokio1.52.3indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotoml0.7.8indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.8indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.19.15indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-capture0.2.0-beta.1indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iotracing-tunnel0.2.0-beta.1indirect
crates.iotrybuild1.0.117indirect
crates.iounicase2.8.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.14indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.iourl2.5.4indirect
crates.ioutf16_iter1.0.5indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.ioversion-sync0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.1+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.9indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow0.5.40indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.46.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iowrite161.0.0indirect
crates.iowriteable0.5.5indirect
crates.ioyoke0.7.5indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.7.5indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.5indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.5indirect
crates.iozerovec0.10.4indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.10.3indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.