Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 22:34 UTC

smakecloud / skeema

Laravel DB Schema Management through Skeema

PHP · BladeMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#database #laravel #php #database-migrations #database-schema

smakecloud/skeema holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (64/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Smake IT GmbHOrganization

4 followers17 public repossince Dec 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	smakecloud/skeema	v0.0.14	5,030	14	507 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

43Weak

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18	Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	2
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

60Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 14 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 507 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~90 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	14
latest_release_tag	v0.0.14
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	507
mean_days_between_releases	90

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

6Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	0
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

49Weak

How it's scored

49.4/80	Monthly downloads — 5,030 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	smakecloud/skeema
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	130,620
monthly_downloads	5,030
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.931

Issue & PR responsiveness

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
26.2/30	PR acceptance — 14/16 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

merged_prs	14
open_issues	1
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
5/25	Owner reach — 4 followers of smakecloud
21.1/25	Track record — 17 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	4
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	smakecloud
public_repos	17
account_age_days	3,577

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 507 days ago
20/20	Version history — 14 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	smakecloud/skeema
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	507

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	database, laravel, php, database-migrations, database-schema
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	118
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 118 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.7/40	Legible commit history — 18 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.182
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/77 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	19,355
source_files_sampled	77
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

0GitHub stars

4contributors

2commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

14releases

1bus factor

1open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 12

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10

4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 22:34 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1	CI-Tests	1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7	Code-Review	Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	illuminate/console	`^9.0\|^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0`	composer.json
Packagist	illuminate/database	`^9.0\|^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0`	composer.json
Packagist	illuminate/filesystem	`^9.0\|^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0`	composer.json
Packagist	illuminate/support	`^9.0\|^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel/framework	`^9.0\|^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/console	`^5.0\|^6.0\|^7.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/process	`^5.0\|^6.0\|^7.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 115 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	laravel/framework	`12.69.2`	direct
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.4.18`	direct
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.4.18`	direct
Packagist	brick/math	`0.14.8`	indirect
Packagist	carbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	dflydev/dot-access-data	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/inflector	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/lexer	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	dragonmantank/cron-expression	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	egulias/email-validator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	fakerphp/faker	`1.24.1`	indirect
Packagist	filp/whoops	`2.18.4`	indirect
Packagist	fruitcake/php-cors	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	graham-campbell/result-type	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.15.5`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.13.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/uri-template	`1.0.11`	indirect
Packagist	hamcrest/hamcrest-php	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pail	`1.2.7`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`1.30.4`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/prompts	`0.3.24`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/serializable-closure	`2.0.16`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/tinker	`2.11.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/commonmark	`2.10.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/config	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/flysystem	`3.36.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/flysystem-local	`3.35.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/mime-type-detection	`1.17.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`1.6.15`	indirect
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`3.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	nesbot/carbon	`3.13.2`	indirect
Packagist	nette/schema	`1.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	nette/utils	`4.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.8.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`8.9.5`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/termwind	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/canvas	`10.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/canvas-core	`10.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/sidekick	`1.2.21`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`10.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench-core	`10.14.1`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/workbench	`10.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpoption/phpoption	`1.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`1.12.34`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`11.0.12`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`5.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`11.5.56`	indirect
Packagist	psr/clock	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/simple-cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psy/psysh	`0.12.24`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/collection	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`4.9.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`6.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`7.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`6.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`7.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`5.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`5.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/clock	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/css-selector	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/error-handler	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/mailer	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/mime	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.41.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-idn	`1.42.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.42.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php83	`1.41.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php85	`1.41.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-uuid	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/routing	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.4.15`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/uid	`7.4.17`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-dumper	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	tijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	vlucas/phpdotenv	`5.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	voku/portable-ascii	`2.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 118 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records