Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 02:11 UTC

smartxworks / cluster-api-provider-kubrid

Kubernetes Cluster API Provider Virtink

Go · MakefileApache-2.0★ 27 stars⑂ 3 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗
#cloud-hypervisor#cluster-api#kubernetes

smartxworks/cluster-api-provider-kubrid holds a health index of 44 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100) and lowest on Vitality (19/100). It was last updated 1150 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

44
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

44
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SmartXOrganization
89 followers31 public repossince Jul 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/smartxworks/cluster-api-provider-virtinkpoints to another repo — not scoredv0.7.0-81150 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

19Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,150 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1,150
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

47Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,150 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~47.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,150
mean_days_between_releases47.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk
How it's scored
23/60Stars — 27 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars27
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

44Weak
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.463

Issue & PR responsiveness

96Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance — 35/36 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

84Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
14.1/25Owner reach — 89 followers of smartxworks
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers89
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginsmartxworks
public_repos31
account_age_days4,007
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscloud-hypervisor, cluster-api, kubernetes
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

29At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

74Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes15,886
source_files_sampled16
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

27GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,150days since last push
8releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/smartxworks/cluster-api-provider-virtink' points at a different repository (https://github.com/smartxworks/cluster-api-provider-virtink); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 02:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/metal3-io/ip-address-manager/apiv0.0.0-20210929111944-d66dc8cb0347go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgov1.16.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.24.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/smartxworks/virtinkv0.10.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.25.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.25.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.25.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20220823124924-e9cbc92d1a73go.mod
Gokubevirt.io/containerized-data-importer-apiv1.50.0go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/cluster-apiv1.3.0go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/testv1.3.0go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.13.1go.mod
All dependencies 133

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 120 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/metal3-io/ip-address-manager/api0.0.0-20210929111944-d66dc8cb0347direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo1.16.5direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.24.1direct
Gogithub.com/smartxworks/virtink0.10.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/client-go0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220823124924-e9cbc92d1a73direct
Gokubevirt.io/containerized-data-importer-api1.50.0direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/cluster-api1.3.0direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/test1.3.0direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.13.1direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/alessio/shellescape1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/antlr/antlr4/runtime/go/antlr0.0.0-20220418222510-f25a4f6275edindirect
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/govalidator0.0.0-20210307081110-f21760c49a8dindirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest14.2.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest0.11.27indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest/adal0.9.20indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest/date0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/logger0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/tracing0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver3.5.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver/v44.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/toml1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/coredns/caddy1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/coredns/corefile-migration1.0.18indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/distribution2.8.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker20.10.21+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connections0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-units0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/drone/envsubst/v22.0.0-20210730161058-179042472c46indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch5.6.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v55.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/zapr1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.22.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gobuffalo/flect0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v44.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcache0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/cel-go0.12.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v4545.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystring1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/safetext0.0.0-20220905092116-b49f7bc46da2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstrings1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/properties1.8.6indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/makenowjust/heredoc1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutils1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v33.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v33.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.16indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.2-0.20181231171920-c182affec369indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winio0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructure1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalk1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tail1.4.8indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v22.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digest1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-spec1.0.3-0.20220114050600-8b9d41f48198indirect
Gogithub.com/openshift/custom-resource-status1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml1.9.5indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v22.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internal1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimal1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/afero1.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cast1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viper1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stoewer/go-strcase1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenv1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjson1.6.3indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.7.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.1.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220909003341-f21342109be1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.4.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220722155302-e5dcc9cfc0b9indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v22.2.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20220617124728-180714bec0adindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v11.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/tomb.v11.0.0-20141024135613-dd632973f1e7indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gogotest.tools/v33.1.0indirect
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver0.25.0indirect
Gok8s.io/apiserver0.25.0indirect
Gok8s.io/cluster-bootstrap0.25.0indirect
Gok8s.io/component-base0.25.0indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.80.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220803164354-a70c9af30aeaindirect
Gokubevirt.io/controller-lifecycle-operator-sdk/api0.0.0-20220329064328-f3cc58c6ed90indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20220713155537-f223a00ba0e2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/kind0.17.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.2.3indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.3.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with smartxworks/cluster-api-provider-kubrid. Read them side by side →

95linode/cluster-api-provider-linodeA Cluster API implementation to create Kubernetes clusters for Linode (CAPL)Exceptional100cilium/ciliumeBPF-based Networking, Security, and ObservabilityExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100containerd/containerdAn open and reliable container runtimeExceptional99stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional99stackloklabs/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.