Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 01:22 UTC

smolcars / react-native-nitro-ark

Pure C++ NitroModule for Ark

Rust · C++ · TypeScriptMIT★ 10 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

smolcars/react-native-nitro-ark holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Security (34/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

smolcarsOrganization
17 followers17 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iologgerpoints to another repo — not scored0.4.03,02673200 days agologgerirontimerlogweb
npmreact-native-nitro-ark0.0.1412,0381442 days agoreact-nativeiosandroidnitro-modulesarkbitcoinarkoorbitcoin-layer2

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 131 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year131
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.0.141
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases6.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars — 10 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars10
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.1/80Monthly downloads — 2,038 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesreact-native-nitro-ark
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,038
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.896
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 61/63 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs61
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach — 17 followers of smolcars
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsmolcars
public_repos17
account_age_days2,570

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 144 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesreact-native-nitro-ark
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs, react-native-nitro-ark/package.json ("prettier")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsark, bitcoin, bitcoin-layer2, cpp, nitro-modules, react-native, rust, scaling, self-custody, nitrogen, nitromodule
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 94 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.5/40Legible commit history — 46 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.46
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,380
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs, react-native-nitro-ark/package.json ("prettier")
11/11Static type checking — react-native-nitro-ark/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsreact-native-nitro-ark/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsbark-cpp/Cargo.toml, logger/Cargo.toml, patched/bitcoin-units/Cargo.toml, react-native-nitro-ark/android/build.gradle, react-native-nitro-ark/example/android/app/build.gradle, react-native-nitro-ark/example/android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50.3/55Manageable file sizes — 5/58 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes2,228,925
source_files_sampled58
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

10GitHub stars
3contributors
131commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'logger' points at a different repository (https://github.com/iron/logger); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'bark-cpp' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
89Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412025-072026-012026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 88
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 01:22 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities94 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobark-wallet—bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iobark-bitcoin-ext—bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iobdk_wallet3.1.0bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iobdk_bitcoind_rpc0.22.0bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7.14bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iobip392.2.0bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.100bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.31bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iologger—bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotonic0.14.3bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.145bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iocxx1.0.186bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4.3bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.31.0bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10.9bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.23.0bark-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4logger/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenv_logger0.11.8logger/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, npm.