Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-30 10:44 UTC

smortexa / laravel-arkitect

Test and enforce architectural rules in your Laravel applications. Keep your app's architecture clean and consistent!

PHPMIT★ 120 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laravel#architecture#php#testing

smortexa/laravel-arkitect holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (55/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MortexaPersonal account
44 followers11 public repossince Jan 2019@exaco

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistmortexa/laravel-arkitectv0.8.137,80813453 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

47Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

39Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

60Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 449 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~111.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv0.8.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release449
mean_days_between_releases111.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak
How it's scored
33.7/60Stars — 120 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars120
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
61/80Monthly downloads — 37,808 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmortexa/laravel-arkitect
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads511,794
monthly_downloads37,808

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.824

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance — 25/26 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs25
open_issues1
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.9/25Owner reach — 44 followers of smortexa
19.9/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers44
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsmortexa
public_repos11
account_age_days2,739
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 453 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmortexa/laravel-arkitect
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish453

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, architecture, php, testing
has_wikino
homepage—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

28At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): dangerous_workflow, packaging, pinned_dependencies, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories24
affected_packages10
assessed_packages133
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 133 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.2/40Legible commit history — 26 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.51
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 51
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/47 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes3,467
source_files_sampled47
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

120GitHub stars
7contributors
1commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712023-022024-042025-06
Major 0Minor 3Patch 1

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 10:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests1 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 133

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 133 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrianium/paratest7.20.0indirect
Packagistbrick/math0.14.8indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.6.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.4.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.10.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.3.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.5indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.1.1indirect
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.1.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework13.5.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.6indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint1.29.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.16indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.12indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker3.0.2indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.2indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.33.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.31.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.16.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.11.4indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.3indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.3indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistondram/ci-detector4.2.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas11.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core11.0.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.2.20indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core11.2.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest4.6.1indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin4.0.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-arch4.0.2indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravel4.1.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-mutate4.0.1indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-profanity4.2.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphparkitect/phparkitect0.8.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage12.5.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator6.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template5.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer8.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit12.5.20indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.22indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser4.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator7.1.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state8.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context7.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version6.0.0indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml8.0.8indirect
Packagistta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test0.8.7indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.4.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.3indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.1.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 133 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
laravel/framework13.5.0indirecthigh213.12.0
symfony/http-kernel8.0.8indirecthigh18.0.12
symfony/mailer8.0.8indirecthigh18.0.12
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.10.0indirectmoderate77.15.1
guzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/mime8.0.8indirectmoderate28.0.12
symfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.36.0indirectmoderate11.38.1
symfony/routing8.0.8indirectmoderate28.0.13
symfony/yaml8.0.8indirectmoderate38.0.12
symfony/http-foundation8.0.8indirectlow18.0.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with smortexa/laravel-arkitect. Read them side by side →

91phparkitect/arkitectPut your architectural rules under test!Excellent97infection/infectionPHP Mutation Testing libraryExceptional96api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional94firecrawl/firecrawlThe context API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥Exceptional94phpstan/phpstanPHP Static Analysis Tool - discover bugs in your code without running it!Exceptional94laravel/frameworkLaravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.