Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 09:05 UTC

soenneker / soenneker.blazor.filepond

A Blazor interop library for the file upload library FilePond

CSS · C# · HTMLMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2024View on GitHub ↗

soenneker/soenneker.blazor.filepond holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jake SoennekerPersonal account
93 followers1,472 public repossince May 2013Nexus Enterprise Solutions

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.FilePond4.0.4032-3,8771 day agoblazorfilepondfileuploadfilepondinteropinteropcsharpdotnetc#

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,195 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,195
human_commit_share0.24
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.0.4032
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars11
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
61.3/80Total downloads — 799,388 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSoenneker.Blazor.FilePond
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads799,388
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.9/30PR acceptance — 5,523/5,539 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5,523
open_issues0
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.2/25Owner reach — 93 followers of soenneker
25/25Track record — 1,472 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers93
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsoenneker
public_repos1,472
account_age_days4,907
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 3,877 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSoenneker.Blazor.FilePond
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://soenneker.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsblazor, csharp, dotnet, file, filepond, filepondinterop, interop, upload
has_wikino
homepagehttps://soenneker.com
docs_sitehttps://soenneker.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages92
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 92 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 24 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Demo/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Demo.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Server/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Server.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 76 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Demo/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Demo.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Server/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Server.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Tests/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.Tests.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.TrimSmoke/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.TrimSmoke.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.76
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — CSS without a type-check config
54/55Manageable file sizes — 1/53 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCSS
largest_source_bytes118,280
source_files_sampled53
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

11GitHub stars
1contributors
2,195commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 09:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSoenneker.Asyncs.Initializers4.0.130src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.InteropEventListener4.0.4192src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.ResourceLoader4.0.1792src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Extensions.List4.0.1007src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Lepton.Suite4.0.122src/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond/Soenneker.Blazor.FilePond.csproj
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 87 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetSoenneker.Asyncs.Initializers4.0.130direct
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.InteropEventListener4.0.4192direct
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.ResourceLoader4.0.1792direct
NuGetSoenneker.Extensions.List4.0.1007direct
NuGetSoenneker.Lepton.Suite4.0.122direct
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-ia322.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.5.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/cli4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc1.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.2indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtw-animate-css1.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components10.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly10.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer10.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.13indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.MockJsRuntime4.0.362indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Lucide4.0.301indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Tailwind4.0.315indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Tailwind.Manifest4.0.295indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Suite4.0.1607indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Serilog.Sinks.Browser.Blazor4.0.438indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Tests.HostedUnit4.0.337indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Utils.Test4.0.341indirect
NuGetTUnit1.76.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 92 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
braces3.0.3indirecthigh1—
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.