Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-30 09:02 UTC

soenneker / soenneker.blazor.videojs

A Blazor interop library for Video.js

CSS · C#MIT★ 5 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗

soenneker/soenneker.blazor.videojs holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jake SoennekerPersonal account
89 followers1,352 public repossince May 2013Nexus Enterprise Solutions

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Videojs4.0.252-2250 days agoblazorvideojsvideohtml5jsinteropvideojsinteropblazorlibrarycsharpdotnetc#

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume909 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year909
human_commit_share0.22
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.0.252
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars5
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
45.7/80Total downloads25,000 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSoenneker.Blazor.Videojs
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads25,000
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
29.6/30PR acceptance830/840 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs830
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.1/25Owner reach89 followers of soenneker
25/25Track record1,352 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers89
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsoenneker
public_repos1,352
account_age_days4,854
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history225 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSoenneker.Blazor.Videojs
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://soenneker.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsblazor, blazorlibrary, csharp, dotnet, html5, interop, js, video, videojs, videojsinterop
has_wikino
homepagehttps://soenneker.com
docs_sitehttps://soenneker.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.4/40Legible commit history1 of 22 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.045
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Demo/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Demo.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Tests/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance78 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Demo/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Demo.csproj, test/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Tests/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.78
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeCSS without a type-check config
52.2/55Manageable file sizes1/20 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCSS
largest_source_bytes690,406
source_files_sampled20
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
909commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-032026-052026-06
Major 0Minor 0Patch 26
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-30 09:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSoenneker.Asyncs.Initializers4.0.84src/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Extensions.EventCallback4.0.458src/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.ResourceLoader4.0.1717src/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Lepton.Suite4.0.55src/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj
NuGetSoenneker.Utils.Json4.0.2645src/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs/Soenneker.Blazor.Videojs.csproj
All dependencies 90

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 85 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetSoenneker.Asyncs.Initializers4.0.84direct
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Extensions.EventCallback4.0.458direct
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.Utils.ResourceLoader4.0.1717direct
NuGetSoenneker.Lepton.Suite4.0.55direct
NuGetSoenneker.Utils.Json4.0.2645direct
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-ia322.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.5.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/cli4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc1.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.2indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtw-animate-css1.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer10.0.11indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Blazor.MockJsRuntime4.0.343indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Lucide4.0.209indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Tailwind4.0.208indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Gen.Tailwind.Manifest4.0.195indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Quark.Suite4.0.1287indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Serilog.Sinks.Browser.Blazor4.0.366indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Tests.HostedUnit4.0.207indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Utils.AutoBogus4.0.929indirect
NuGetSoenneker.Utils.Test4.0.324indirect
NuGetTUnit1.65.68indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.