Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 13:01 UTC

soju06 / codex-lb

Codex/ChatGPT multiple account load balancer & proxy with usage tracking, dashboard, and OpenCode-compatible endpoints

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 2,329 stars⑂ 363 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#api-proxy#chatgpt#codex#dashboard#fastapi#load-balancer#oauth#openai#python#rate-limit#sqlalchemy#usage-tracking#opencode#multiple-accounts#openclaw

soju06/codex-lb holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Soju06Personal account
439 followers45 public repossince Dec 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIcodex-lb1.21.03,807660 days agochatgptcodexdashboardfastapiload-balancerproxyrate-limitusage

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 879 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year879
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 68 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count68
latest_release_tagv1.21.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases4.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent
How it's scored
54.6/60Stars — 2,329 stars
21.3/25Forks — 363 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks363
stars2,329
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 81 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled81
top_contributor_share0.411

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good
How it's scored
33.7/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
23.7/30PR acceptance — 767/971 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs767
open_issues59
closed_issues241
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.803
closed_unmerged_prs204
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19/25Owner reach — 439 followers of Soju06
24.1/25Track record — 45 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers439
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginSoju06
public_repos45
account_age_days3,146
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 66 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodex-lb
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://soju06.github.io/codex-lb/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi-proxy, chatgpt, codex, dashboard, fastapi, load-balancer, oauth, openai, python, rate-limit, sqlalchemy, usage-tracking, opencode, multiple-accounts, openclaw
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://soju06.github.io/codex-lb/
docs_sitehttps://soju06.github.io/codex-lb/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 51 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.7

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .agents/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.agents/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes81,716
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 38/1,142 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,212,476
source_files_sampled1,142
oversized_source_files38

Key facts

2,329GitHub stars
81contributors
879commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
68releases
2bus factor
59open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 13:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities51 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 49
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.4.0frontend/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.2frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.101.2frontend/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.4.0frontend/package.json
npmi18next^26.3.6frontend/package.json
npmi18next-browser-languagedetector^8.2.1frontend/package.json
npminput-otp^1.4.2frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.24.0frontend/package.json
npmradix-ui^1.6.2frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmreact-day-picker^10.0.1frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmreact-hook-form^7.81.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-i18next^17.0.9frontend/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.1frontend/package.json
npmrecharts^3.9.2frontend/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0frontend/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.2frontend/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.14frontend/package.json
PyPIaiohttp>=3.13.4pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp-retry>=2.9.1pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic>=1.16.5pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.22.1pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg>=0.30.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbcrypt>=4.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbrotli>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi>=2026.4.22pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=46.0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.128.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgreenlet>=3.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPImako>=1.3.12pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.5pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpygments>=2.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-socks>=2.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpyotp>=2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.27pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.2.12pyproject.toml
PyPIsegno>=1.6.6pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.45pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3>=2.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIzstandard>=0.25.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp-socks>=0.10.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 183

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 49 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.4.0direct
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.2direct
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.101.2direct
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1direct
npmclsx^2.1.1direct
npmdate-fns^4.4.0direct
npmi18next^26.3.6direct
npmi18next-browser-languagedetector^8.2.1direct
npminput-otp^1.4.2direct
npmlucide-react^1.24.0direct
npmradix-ui^1.6.2direct
npmreact^19.2.7direct
npmreact-day-picker^10.0.1direct
npmreact-dom^19.2.7direct
npmreact-hook-form^7.81.0direct
npmreact-i18next^17.0.9direct
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.1direct
npmrecharts^3.9.2direct
npmsonner^2.0.7direct
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0direct
npmtailwindcss^4.3.2direct
npmzod^4.4.3direct
npmzustand^5.0.14direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.1direct
PyPIaiohttp-retry2.9.1direct
PyPIaiohttp-socks0.11.0direct
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1direct
PyPIalembic1.18.5direct
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0direct
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0direct
PyPIbrotli1.2.0direct
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17direct
PyPIcryptography49.0.0direct
PyPIfastapi0.136.1direct
PyPIgreenlet3.5.3direct
PyPImako1.3.12direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2direct
PyPIpygments2.20.0direct
PyPIpyotp2.10.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32direct
PyPIpython-socks2.8.1direct
PyPIsegno1.6.6direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIwebsockets16.1direct
PyPIzstandard0.25.0direct
npm@eslint/js^10.0.1indirect
npm@playwright/test^1.61.1indirect
npm@testing-library/jest-dom^6.9.1indirect
npm@testing-library/react^16.3.2indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event^14.6.1indirect
npm@types/node^26.1.1indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.17indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.3indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react-swc^4.3.1indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v8^4.1.10indirect
npmeslint^10.7.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react-hooks^7.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react-refresh^0.5.3indirect
npmglobals^17.7.0indirect
npmjsdom^29.1.1indirect
npmmsw^2.15.0indirect
npmreact-doctor^0.7.7indirect
npmshadcn^4.13.0indirect
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript~6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.64.0indirect
npmvite^8.1.4indirect
npmvitest^4.1.10indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.0indirect
PyPIcodex-lb1.21.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfastapi-cli0.0.24indirect
PyPIfastapi-cloud-cli0.17.1indirect
PyPIfastar0.11.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.80.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttptools0.7.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.14.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenai2.45.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-aiohttp-client0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemy0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.64b0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.25.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-extra-types2.11.1indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.3.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-toolkit0.19.9indirect
PyPIrignore0.7.6indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIsentry-sdk2.60.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPIty0.0.59indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.47.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.3.3indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with soju06/codex-lb. Read them side by side →

99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional99langchain-ai/langgraphBuild resilient agents.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional97fastapi/sqlmodelSQL databases in Python, designed for simplicity, compatibility, and robustness.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.