Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-03 04:13 UTC

sonata-project / SonataClassificationBundle

Symfony SonataClassificationBundle

PHPMIT★ 91 stars⑂ 111 forkssince Oct 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

sonata-project/SonataClassificationBundle holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (82/100) and lowest on Vitality (43/100). It was last updated 92 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sonata ProjectOrganization
68 followers55 public repossince Sep 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistsonata-project/classification-bundle4.11.012,22262226 days agocategorytaxonomytag

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

43Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 92 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push92
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 57 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 226 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~105.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tag4.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release226
mean_days_between_releases105.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.7/60Stars — 91 stars
17/25Forks — 111 forks
7/15Watchers — 19 watchers
Inputs used
forks111
stars91
watchers19
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
54.5/80Monthly downloads — 12,222 downloads/month across packagist
9.5/20Registry dependents — 26 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagessonata-project/classification-bundle
dependents26
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,223,748
monthly_downloads12,222

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 72 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 49 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled72
top_contributor_share0.402
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 770/902 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs770
open_issues0
closed_issues104
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs132
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.2/25Owner reach — 68 followers of sonata-project
24.7/25Track record — 55 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers68
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginsonata-project
public_repos55
account_age_days5,798
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 226 days ago
20/20Version history — 62 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessonata-project/classification-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish226

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.sonata-project.org/projects/SonataClassificationBundle
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbundle, category, php, sonata, symfony, symfony-bundle, tag, taxonomy
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.sonata-project.org/projects/SonataClassificationBundle
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 15/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 49 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, dangerous_workflow, packaging, pinned_dependencies, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages44
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 44 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.7/40Legible commit history — 52 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.52
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/84 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes10,894
source_files_sampled84
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

91GitHub stars
72contributors
12commits, last 12 months
92days since last push
57releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 111 ⇿
0Stars
111Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011042013-102019-102025-10
Major 1Minor 28Patch 25

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 04:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests8 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 15/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 49 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcocur/slugify^4.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/collections^1.6 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/persistence^3.0.2 || ^4.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/form^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/routing^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/validator^6.4 || ^7.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/twig^3.0composer.json
All dependencies 47

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcocur/slugifydirect
Packagistdoctrine/collectionsdirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistencedirect
Packagistsymfony/configdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectiondirect
Packagistsymfony/formdirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundationdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kerneldirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolverdirect
Packagistsymfony/routingdirect
Packagistsymfony/translationdirect
Packagistsymfony/validatordirect
Packagisttwig/twigdirect
Packagistdama/doctrine-test-bundleindirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundleindirect
Packagistdoctrine/mongodb-odmindirect
Packagistdoctrine/ormindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistknplabs/knp-menuindirect
Packagistknplabs/knp-menu-bundleindirect
Packagistmasterminds/html5indirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-config-testindirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-testindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parserindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfonyindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistsonata-project/admin-bundleindirect
Packagistsonata-project/block-bundleindirect
Packagistsonata-project/doctrine-orm-admin-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/assetindirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kitindirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemindirect
Packagistsymfony/security-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/security-csrfindirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIsphinx6.2.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme1.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 44 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.