Public recordWeak
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 04:27 UTC
soultech67 / opctl
Free and open source automation platform
soultech67/opctl holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 58 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
45
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Scott BurkhalterPersonal account
0 followers3 public repossince Apr 2015
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/opctl/opctlpoints to another repo — not scored | v0.1.76 | - | 35 | 82 days ago | — |
| npm | @opctl/sdkpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.0.0-alpha.5 | 36 | 6 | 2646 days ago | opctl |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
60
Development activity
40Weak
How it's scored
| 18/36 | Push recency — last push 58 days ago |
| 6.9/36 | Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits |
| 12.4/18 | Commit volume — 23 commits in the last year |
| 3/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 23 |
| human_commit_share | 0.86 |
| days_since_last_push | 58 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 10 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 7 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 58 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~10.1 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 7 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.1.82 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 58 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 10.1 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
12
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 0 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 0 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | no |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | 5 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | codecov.io, github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
45
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 4.3/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 17 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 17 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.81 |
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 30/30 | PR acceptance — 8/8 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 8 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 0 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 0/25 | Owner reach — 0 followers of soultech67 |
| 16.4/25 | Track record — 3 public repos, account ~11 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 0 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | soultech67 |
| public_repos | 3 |
| account_age_days | 4,158 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
70
Engineering practices
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 4 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — sdks/js/package.json ("standard"), webapp/package.json ("eslintConfig") |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://opctl.io |
| 0/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://opctl.io |
| docs_site | https://opctl.io |
| has_readme | no |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | no |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
34
Security posture
27At Risk
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 2.2/7.5 | Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 228 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2.7 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 9.1/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: node-fetch 1.7.3 (high 8.8), ajv 5.5.2 (moderate 5.6) |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 29.4/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,696 days ago |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 3 |
| affected_packages | 2 |
| assessed_packages | 40 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | high 1, moderate 1 |
| direct_affected_packages | 2 |
Matched the npm:@opctl/sdk@0.0.0-alpha.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 40 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
84
Agent context & guidance
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 16.1/40 | Legible commit history — 26 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.302 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 5,036 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — sdks/js/package.json ("standard"), webapp/package.json ("eslintConfig") |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — sdks/js/tsconfig.json, webapp/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 18 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | go.sum, yarn.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | sdks/js/tsconfig.json, webapp/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0.18 |
| toolchain_manifests | .opspec/changelog/getLatestRelease/go.mod, examples/run-a-go-service/go.mod, go.mod |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.14 |
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 54.9/55 | Manageable file sizes — 1/778 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 309,786 |
| source_files_sampled | 778 |
| oversized_source_files | 1 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 40/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — api/openapi.yaml |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | api/openapi.yaml |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
0GitHub stars
17contributors
23commits, last 12 months
58days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Community profile unavailable
- go package 'github.com/opctl/opctl' points at a different repository (https://github.com/opctl/opctl); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- npm package '@opctl/sdk' points at a different repository (https://github.com/opctl/sdk-js); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 3 | Maintained | 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 228 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 72
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/appdataspec/sdk-golang | v0.0.0-20170917062448-0c0ade7a92f7 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/blang/semver | v3.5.1+incompatible | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/containers/image/v5 | v5.30.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/dgraph-io/badger/v4 | v4.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/distribution/reference | v0.5.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/docker/docker | v27.3.1+incompatible | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/docker/go-connections | v0.5.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/fatih/color | v1.15.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/ghodss/yaml | v1.0.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/glinton/ping | v0.1.3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-delve/delve | v1.25.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-git/go-git/v5 | v5.17.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/golang-interfaces/github.com-gorilla-websocket | v0.0.0-20190604222234-f7c71d63fecb | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/golang-interfaces/ihttp | v0.0.0-20170731143308-228dd9eedf13 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gorilla/handlers | v1.4.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gorilla/mux | v1.8.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gorilla/websocket | v1.5.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/jfbus/httprs | v0.0.0-20180614100821-7861a1150846 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter/v6 | v6.2.3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/miekg/dns | v1.1.55 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/onsi/ginkgo | v1.16.6-0.20211014152641-f228134fe057 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/onsi/gomega | v1.34.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/opencontainers/image-spec | v1.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/peterh/liner | v1.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/rhysd/go-github-selfupdate | v1.2.3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/satori/go.uuid | v1.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/sethgrid/pester | v1.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4 | v4.25.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/skratchdot/open-golang | v0.0.0-20200116055534-eef842397966 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/cobra | v1.9.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/pflag | v1.0.6 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema | v1.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/net | v0.47.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sync | v0.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.37.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard | v0.0.0-20231211153847-12269c276173 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard/wgctrl | v0.0.0-20230429144221-925a1e7659e6 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2 | v2.2.1 | go.mod |
| Go | k8s.io/api | v0.29.3 | go.mod |
| Go | k8s.io/apimachinery | v0.29.3 | go.mod |
| Go | k8s.io/client-go | v0.29.3 | go.mod |
| npm | @emotion/css | ^11.1.3 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | @types/react-modal | ^3.16.3 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | ace-builds | ^1.4.12 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | buffer | ^6.0.3 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | js-yaml | ^3.14.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | path-browserify | ^1.0.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react | ^19.1.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-ace | ^14.0.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-autosuggest | ^10.0.4 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^19.1.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-easy-panzoom | ^0.4.4 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-modal | ^3.16.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-router-dom | ^5.2.0 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | react-toastify | ^11.0.5 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | reboot.css | ^1.0.4 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | typescript | ^4.1.3 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | uuid | ^8.3.1 | webapp/package.json |
| npm | @docusaurus/core | ^3.8.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | @docusaurus/plugin-google-analytics | ^3.8.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | @docusaurus/preset-classic | ^3.8.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | @mdx-js/react | ^3.1.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | classnames | ^2.5.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | prism-react-renderer | ^2.4.0 | website/package.json |
| npm | react | ^19.1.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^19.1.1 | website/package.json |
| npm | @codefresh-io/docker-reference | ^0.0.5 | sdks/js/package.json |
| npm | @types/node-fetch | ^2.3.2 | sdks/js/package.json |
| npm | ajv | ^6.12.3 | sdks/js/package.json |
| npm | node-fetch | ^2.6.1 | sdks/js/package.json |
| npm | typescript | ^4.1.3 | sdks/js/package.json |
| npm | universal-websocket-client | ^1.0.1 | sdks/js/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Dependency advisories 2
Installing npm:@opctl/sdk@0.0.0-alpha.5 pulls in 40 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| node-fetch | 1.7.3 | direct | high | 1 | 3.1.1 |
| ajv | 5.5.2 | direct | moderate | 2 | 8.18.0 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.