Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 11:45 UTC

spagu / ssg

A simple static site generator written in Go. Converts content from WordPress exports (Markdown format with YAML frontmatter) to static HTML, CSS, and JS files.

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

#generator #github-actions #golang #markdown #ssg #static-site

spagu/ssg holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mona LisaPersonal account

7 followers44 public repossince Jan 2015Tradik Limited

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/spagu/ssg	v1.8.60	-	95	1 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36	Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 600 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	600
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	17

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 96 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~1.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	96
latest_release_tag	v1.8.61
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

7.7/60	Stars — 4 stars
0/25	Forks — 1 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1
stars	4
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

41.5/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
27.3/30	PR acceptance — 103/113 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	103
open_issues	2
closed_issues	158
prs_merged_7d	7
prs_decided_7d	9
prs_merged_30d	37
prs_decided_30d	39
issue_closed_ratio	0.988
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25	Owner reach — 7 followers of spagu
24/25	Track record — 44 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	7
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	spagu
public_repos	44
account_age_days	4,253

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 95 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/spagu/ssg
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://ssg.tradik.com/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	generator, github-actions, golang, markdown, ssg, static-site
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://ssg.tradik.com/
docs_site	https://ssg.tradik.com/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	7.3

Dependency advisories

87Excellent

How it's scored

26/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: github.com/disintegration/imaging v1.6.2 (low), golang.org/x/crypto v0.56.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
39/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,103 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	47
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	low 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 47 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://ssg.tradik.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 97 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://ssg.tradik.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.99
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, packaging/freebsd/Makefile, packaging/openbsd/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, packaging/freebsd/Makefile, packaging/openbsd/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 7/638 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	250,291
source_files_sampled	638
oversized_source_files	7

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — internal/mddb/proto/mddb.proto
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	internal/mddb/proto/mddb.proto
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

4GitHub stars

1contributors

600commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

96releases

1bus factor

2open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Star history carried forward from 2026-01-18: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 4 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 4 ★ / 1 ⇿

4Stars

1Forks

6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-01-18. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

Major 0Minor 1Patch 4

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10

7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 11:44 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 24

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/BurntSushi/toml	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aymerick/raymond	`v2.0.2+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cbroglie/mustache	`v1.4.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/disintegration/imaging	`v1.6.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/flosch/pongo2/v6	`v6.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jackc/pgx/v5	`v5.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jlaffaye/ftp	`v0.2.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday	`v1.0.27`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/sftp	`v1.13.11`	go.mod
Go	github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.62.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ulikunitz/xz	`v0.5.16`	go.mod
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark-highlighting/v2	`v2.0.0-20230729083705-37449abec8cc`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.56.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.45.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.58.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.41.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.83.2`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.12`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	lukechampine.com/blake3	`v1.4.1`	go.mod
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.58.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 47

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aymerick/raymond	`v2.0.2+incompatible`	direct
Go	github.com/burntsushi/toml	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/cbroglie/mustache	`v1.4.2`	direct
Go	github.com/disintegration/imaging	`v1.6.2`	direct
Go	github.com/flosch/pongo2/v6	`v6.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.1`	direct
Go	github.com/jackc/pgx/v5	`v5.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/jlaffaye/ftp	`v0.2.4`	direct
Go	github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday	`v1.0.27`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/sftp	`v1.13.11`	direct
Go	github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.62.0`	direct
Go	github.com/ulikunitz/xz	`v0.5.16`	direct
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.6`	direct
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark-highlighting/v2	`v2.0.0-20230729083705-37449abec8cc`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.56.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.45.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.58.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.41.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.83.2`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.12`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	lukechampine.com/blake3	`v1.4.1`	direct
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.58.0`	direct
Go	filippo.io/edwards25519	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymerick/douceur	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2	`v2.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/css	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgpassfile	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgservicefile	`v0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/puddle/v2	`v2.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2	`v2.0.9`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/fs	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/pretty	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/ncruces/go-strftime	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/quic-go/qpack	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft	`v0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daec`	indirect
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.16.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaa`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/libc	`v1.75.6`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/mathutil	`v1.7.1`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/memory	`v1.12.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 47 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
github.com/disintegration/imaging	`v1.6.2`	direct	low	1	—
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.56.0`	direct	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records