Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 14:04 UTC

spatie / laravel-mailcoach-sdk

An SDK to easily work with the Mailcoach API in Laravel apps

PHPMIT★ 42 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

spatie/laravel-mailcoach-sdk holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (81/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpatieOrganization
3,854 followers529 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistspatie/laravel-mailcoach-sdk1.6.030,709106 days agolaravelspatielaravel-mailcoach-sdk

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year16
human_commit_share0.592
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~155.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tag1.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases155.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.2/60Stars — 42 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars42
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.8/80Monthly downloads — 30,709 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesspatie/laravel-mailcoach-sdk
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads460,978
monthly_downloads30,709
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.483
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance — 34/39 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues0
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,854 followers of spatie
25/25Track record — 529 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,854
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginspatie
public_repos529
account_age_days4,511

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspatie/laravel-mailcoach-sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mailcoach.app
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, mail, mailcoach, newsletters, php
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mailcoach.app
docs_sitehttps://mailcoach.app
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestscomposer.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.6/40Legible commit history — 17 of 58 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.293
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
6.1/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 98 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 24 of the last 98 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.031
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.245
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes14,844
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

42GitHub stars
10contributors
16commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
10releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/spatie/laravel-mailcoach-sdk: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:04:50Z. Please include `A9A4:318B2:A27109B:9E66011:6AA9507F` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101022022-122024-072026-03
Major 0Minor 5Patch 2

Each point covers 3 days.

Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.5composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.13.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/mailcoach-sdk-php^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 11

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagistilluminate/contracts—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools—direct
Packagistspatie/mailcoach-sdk-php—direct
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravel—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-ray—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.