Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 18:11 UTC

spatie / laravel-pdf

Create PDF files in Laravel apps

PHPMIT★ 1,035 stars⑂ 98 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗

spatie/laravel-pdf holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpatieOrganization

3,804 followers524 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	spatie/laravel-pdf	2.12.0	567,534	41	41 days ago	laravel spatie laravel-pdf

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 128 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	128
human_commit_share	0.9
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 41 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	41
latest_release_tag	2.12.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	41
mean_days_between_releases	10.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

72Good

How it's scored

48.9/60	Stars — 1,035 stars
16.6/25	Forks — 98 forks
6.2/15	Watchers — 14 watchers

Inputs used

forks	98
stars	1,035
watchers	14
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

85Excellent

How it's scored

76.7/80	Monthly downloads — 567,534 downloads/month across packagist
8.7/20	Registry dependents — 19 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	spatie/laravel-pdf
dependents	19
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	5,201,993
monthly_downloads	567,534
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 45 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	45
top_contributor_share	0.721

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

41.5/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.1/30	PR acceptance — 86/107 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	86
open_issues	1
closed_issues	79
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.988
closed_unmerged_prs	21
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25	Owner reach — 3,804 followers of spatie
25/25	Track record — 524 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,804
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	spatie
public_repos	524
account_age_days	4,457

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 41 days ago
20/20	Version history — 41 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	spatie/laravel-pdf
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
12/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://spatie.be/docs/laravel-pdf
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	laravel, pdf, php
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://spatie.be/docs/laravel-pdf
docs_site	https://spatie.be/docs/laravel-pdf
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 11 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 8/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	105
unassessed_packages	29
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 105 resolved dependencies against OSV. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40	Legible commit history — 45 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.5
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.26
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.08

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/85 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	20,215
source_files_sampled	85
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

1,035GitHub stars

45contributors

128commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

41releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npm, Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 98 ⇿

0Stars

98Forks

41Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 21Patch 18

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 18:10 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6	CI-Tests	11 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 8/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10	Contributors	project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	illuminate/contracts	`^11.0\|^12.0\|^13.0`	composer.json
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`^1.16.1`	composer.json
Packagist	spatie/temporary-directory	`^2.2.1`	composer.json
npm	pixelmatch	`^5.3.0`	package.json
npm	pngjs	`^7.0.0`	package.json
npm	puppeteer	`^22.8.2`	package.json

All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 127 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	pixelmatch	`5.3.0`	direct
npm	pngjs	`6.0.0`	direct
npm	pngjs	`7.0.0`	direct
npm	puppeteer	`22.15.0`	direct
Packagist	illuminate/contracts	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/temporary-directory	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@puppeteer/browsers	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	@tootallnate/quickjs-emscripten	`0.23.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.15.30`	indirect
npm	@types/yauzl	`2.10.3`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ast-types	`0.13.4`	indirect
npm	b4a	`1.6.7`	indirect
npm	bare-events	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	bare-fs	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	bare-os	`3.6.1`	indirect
npm	bare-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	bare-stream	`2.6.5`	indirect
npm	base64-js	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	basic-ftp	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	buffer	`5.7.1`	indirect
npm	buffer-crc32	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chromium-bidi	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	degenerator	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	devtools-protocol	`0.0.1312386`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	end-of-stream	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	extract-zip	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	fast-fifo	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	fd-slicer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	get-uri	`6.0.4`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	ieee754	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	jsbn	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`7.18.3`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	netmask	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	pac-proxy-agent	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	pac-resolver	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	pend	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	progress	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	proxy-agent	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	pump	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	puppeteer-core	`22.15.0`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.2`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.8.4`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`8.0.5`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	streamx	`2.22.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	tar-fs	`3.0.9`	indirect
npm	tar-stream	`3.1.7`	indirect
npm	text-decoder	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	unbzip2-stream	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	urlpattern-polyfill	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.18.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yauzl	`2.10.0`	indirect
npm	zod	`3.23.8`	indirect
Packagist	chrome-php/chrome	`—`	indirect
Packagist	dompdf/dompdf	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-imagick	`—`	indirect
Packagist	larastan/larastan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`—`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`—`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-arch	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-laravel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pontedilana/php-weasyprint	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/image	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/invade	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/laravel-ray	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pdf-to-image	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pdf-to-text	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pest-expectations	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pest-plugin-snapshots	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pixelmatch-php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-encrypt	`—`	indirect
Packagist	wnx/sidecar-browsershot	`—`	indirect
PyPI	weasyprint	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 105 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
basic-ftp	`5.0.5`	indirect	critical	4	`5.3.1`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.0`
tar-fs	`3.0.9`	indirect	high	1	`3.1.1`
ws	`8.18.2`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
ip-address	`9.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`10.1.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records