Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-07 11:29 UTC

spatie / livewire-filepond

Upload files using Filepond in Livewire components

PHPMIT★ 311 stars⑂ 39 forkssince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗

spatie/livewire-filepond holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpatieOrganization
3,813 followers525 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistspatie/livewire-filepond1.7.149,36117160 days agolaraveluploadsspatielivewirelivewire-filepond

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume45 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases17 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 160 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~56.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tag1.7.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release160
mean_days_between_releases56.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.4/60Stars311 stars
13.2/25Forks39 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks39
stars311
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.6/80Monthly downloads49,361 downloads/month across packagist
4.7/20Registry dependents4 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesspatie/livewire-filepond
dependents4
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads663,726
monthly_downloads49,361
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth19 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled19
top_contributor_share0.515
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance34/46 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues0
closed_issues33
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach3,813 followers of spatie
25/25Track record525 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,813
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginspatie
public_repos525
account_age_days4,472
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 160 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspatie/livewire-filepond
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish160

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://spatie.be/open-source
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfilepond, laravel, livewire, php, uploads
has_wikino
homepagehttps://spatie.be/open-source
docs_sitehttps://spatie.be/open-source
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities25 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories25
affected_packages6
assessed_packages58
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 58 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.7/40Legible commit history33 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.388
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance12 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.12
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/50 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes4,704
source_files_sampled50
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

311GitHub stars
19contributors
45commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 39 ⇿
0Stars
39Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030403922024-072025-042026-02
Major 0Minor 6Patch 7

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-07 11:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities25 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/contracts^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistlivewire/livewire^4.1.3composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.92.7composer.json
npmfilepond^4.31.1package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-file-validate-size^2.2.8package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-file-validate-type^1.2.9package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-image-crop^2.0.6package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-image-preview^4.6.12package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-image-resize^2.0.10package.json
npmfilepond-plugin-image-transform^3.8.7package.json
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmfilepond4.31.1direct
npmfilepond-plugin-file-validate-size2.2.8direct
npmfilepond-plugin-file-validate-type1.2.9direct
npmfilepond-plugin-image-crop2.0.6direct
npmfilepond-plugin-image-preview4.6.12direct
npmfilepond-plugin-image-resize2.0.10direct
npmfilepond-plugin-image-transform3.8.7direct
Packagistilluminate/contractsdirect
Packagistlivewire/livewiredirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-toolsdirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.18.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.18.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.5indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin1.0.5indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.39indirect
npmrollup4.18.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.0indirect
npmvite5.3.3indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
Packagistlarastan/larastanindirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collisionindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-archindirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravelindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 58 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rollup4.18.1indirectcritical24.59.0
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.4.39indirecthigh48.5.23
vite5.3.3indirecthigh158.0.16
esbuild0.21.5indirectmoderate10.25.0
nanoid3.3.7indirectmoderate15.0.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.