Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 03:53 UTC

spf13 / afero

The Universal Filesystem Abstraction for Go

GoApache-2.0★ 6,693 stars⑂ 570 forkssince Oct 2014View on GitHub ↗

spf13/afero holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated 13 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Steve FranciaPersonal account
16,639 followers117 public repossince Dec 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0-37353 days ago
Gogithub.com/spf13/afero/gcsfsv1.15.0-2353 days ago
Gogithub.com/spf13/afero/sftpfsv1.15.0-2353 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

64Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 13 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18Commit volume84 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year84
human_commit_share0.74
days_since_last_push13
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases31 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 353 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~127.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv1.15.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release353
mean_days_between_releases127.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars6,693 stars
23/25Forks570 forks
10.7/15Watchers85 watchers
Inputs used
forks570
stars6,693
watchers85
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgoreportcard.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth86 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 42 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled86
top_contributor_share0.179
How it's scored
23.4/42Issue resolution56% of issues closed
14/30PR acceptance178/381 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs178
open_issues104
closed_issues131
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.557
closed_unmerged_prs203
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach16,639 followers of spf13
25/25Track record117 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers16,639
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginspf13
public_repos117
account_age_days6,086
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on go
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 353 days ago
20/20Version history37 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/spf13/afero, github.com/spf13/afero/gcsfs, github.com/spf13/afero/sftpfs
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish353

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscompression, filesystem, fs, go, golang, network-file-system, network-file-transfer, vfs, virtual
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 42 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.36.0 (critical 10.0), golang.org/x/text v0.34.0 (unknown), golang.org/x/text v0.38.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 287 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories56
affected_packages7
assessed_packages48
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 48 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history67 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.905
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgcsfs/go.mod, go.mod, sftpfs/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice22 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance26 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.22
toolchain_manifestsgcsfs/go.mod, go.mod, sftpfs/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.26
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/64 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes25,387
source_files_sampled64
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6,693GitHub stars
86contributors
84commits, last 12 months
13days since last push
31releases
4bus factor
104open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 570 ⇿
0Stars
570Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050060056182014-112020-102026-08
Major 0Minor 14Patch 17

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 03:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 42 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.51.0gcsfs/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0gcsfs/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.28.0gcsfs/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.226.0gcsfs/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.8sftpfs/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0sftpfs/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.36.0sftpfs/go.mod
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 41 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.51.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.8direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.28.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.34.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.226.0direct
Gocel.dev/exprv0.19.2indirect
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.118.3indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.15.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.7indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.6.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iamv1.4.1indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/monitoringv1.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cncf/xds/gov0.0.0-20250121191232-2f005788dc42indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoyv1.32.4indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validatev1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.5indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/detectors/gcpv1.25.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/exporter/metricv0.51.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/internal/resourcemappingv0.51.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/fsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/planetscale/vtprotobufv0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/gcpv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.59.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.59.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.34.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.19.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.11.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20250303144028-a0af3efb3debindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20250303144028-a0af3efb3debindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20250303144028-a0af3efb3debindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.71.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.5indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 48 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.36.0directcritical320.52.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.71.0indirectcritical41.82.1
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.34.0indirecthigh41.43.0
golang.org/x/netv0.37.0indirectmoderate131.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.34.0directunknown10.39.0
golang.org/x/textv0.38.0directunknown10.39.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.31.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.