Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 02:33 UTC

sphinx-doc / sphinx

The Sphinx documentation generator

Python · JavaScriptCustom license★ 7,991 stars⑂ 2,539 forkssince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#python #documentation #documentation-tool #sphinx #markdown #restructuredtext #docs

sphinx-doc/sphinx holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (89/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SphinxOrganization · verified domain

329 followers23 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	sphinxpoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.2	192	3	4394 days ago	guard config options object
PyPI	Sphinx	9.1.0	74,447,668	241	239 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
14.5/36	Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 233 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	233
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	21

Release discipline

78Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 79 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 239 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~3.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	79
latest_release_tag	v9.1.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	239
mean_days_between_releases	3.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

89Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

98Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 7,991 stars
25/25	Forks — 2,539 forks
12.5/15	Watchers — 175 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2,539
stars	7,991
watchers	175
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

71Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 74,447,668 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	Sphinx
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	74,447,668
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 105 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	98
top_contributor_share	0.442

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

35.4/42	Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
24.6/30	PR acceptance — 5,403/6,587 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/16 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	5,403
open_issues	1,189
closed_issues	6,349
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	6
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	34
issue_closed_ratio	0.842
closed_unmerged_prs	1,184
first_time_authors_30d	10
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	16

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
18.1/25	Owner reach — 329 followers of sphinx-doc
22.1/25	Track record — 23 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	329
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	sphinx-doc
public_repos	23
account_age_days	4,294

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 239 days ago
20/20	Version history — 241 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	Sphinx
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	239

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .ruff.toml, tox.ini
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.sphinx-doc.org/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	python, documentation, documentation-tool, sphinx, markdown, restructuredtext, docs
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.sphinx-doc.org/
docs_site	https://www.sphinx-doc.org/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 105 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

68Good

How it's scored

18.1/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: requests 2.32.5 (moderate 5.5), pygments 2.19.2 (low 3.3)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.8/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 158 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	84
affected_packages	22
assessed_packages	216
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 10, moderate 7, low 3
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 216 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.4/40	Legible commit history — 57 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.626
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, doc/Makefile, doc/_static/Makefile, sphinx/templates/texinfo/Makefile, tests/roots/test-root/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .ruff.toml, tox.ini
11/11	Static type checking — sphinx/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile, doc/Makefile, doc/_static/Makefile, sphinx/templates/texinfo/Makefile, tests/roots/test-root/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	sphinx/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Code legibility for models

81Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (sphinx/py.typed)
54.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 16/931 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	163,954
source_files_sampled	931
oversized_source_files	16

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example, examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7,991GitHub stars

98contributors

233commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

79releases

2bus factor

1,189open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 27 authors (cap 12)
npm package 'sphinx' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jasonbellamy/sphinx); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,539 ⇿

0Stars

2,539Forks

70Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 4Minor 11Patch 43

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10

5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 02:33 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 105 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 17

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`>=1.0.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`>=1.0.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`>=2.0.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`>=1.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`>=1.0.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`>=1.1.9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	Jinja2	`>=3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	Pygments	`>=2.17`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	docutils	`>=0.21,<0.23`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`>=2.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	babel	`>=2.13`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	alabaster	`>=0.7.14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	imagesize	`>=1.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.30.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	roman-numerals	`>=1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`>=23.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	colorama	`>=0.4.6`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 216

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	direct
PyPI	babel	`2.17.0`	direct
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	direct
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.3`	direct
PyPI	imagesize	`1.4.1`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`25.0`	direct
PyPI	pygments	`2.19.2`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	direct
PyPI	roman-numerals	`3.1.0`	direct
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.0.1`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	direct
npm	@bazel/runfiles	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	accepts	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	async	`3.2.6`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	ejs	`3.1.10`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	express	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	filelist	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	immediate	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	jake	`10.9.4`	indirect
npm	jasmine-browser-runner	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	jasmine-core	`5.12.1`	indirect
npm	jszip	`3.10.1`	indirect
npm	lie	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	pako	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	router	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	selenium-webdriver	`4.38.0`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	setimmediate	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	tmp	`0.2.5`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-is	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.18.3`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2025.11.12`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`46.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	cython	`3.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	email-validator	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	polib	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`2.23`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyopenssl	`25.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pypi-attestations	`0.0.28`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyrefly	`0.44.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.407`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`44.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2025.11.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3161-client	`1.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rfc8785	`0.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.14.9`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	securesystemslib	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`80.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	sigstore	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sigstore-models	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	sigstore-rekor-types	`0.0.18`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-lint	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-websupport	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	tuf	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	ty	`0.0.10`	indirect
PyPI	types-colorama	`0.4.15.20250801`	indirect
PyPI	types-defusedxml	`0.7.0.20250822`	indirect
PyPI	types-docutils	`0.22.3.20251115`	indirect
PyPI	types-pillow	`10.2.0.20240822`	indirect
PyPI	types-pygments	`2.19.0.20251121`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.32.4.20250913`	indirect
PyPI	types-urllib3	`1.26.25.14`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.5.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 22

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 216 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 22 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
cryptography	`46.0.3`	indirect	critical	13	`50.0.0`
pyopenssl	`25.3.0`	indirect	critical	4	`26.0.0`
brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
jaraco-context	`6.0.1`	indirect	high	2	`6.1.0`
minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
path-to-regexp	`8.3.0`	indirect	high	2	`8.4.0`
pyasn1	`0.6.1`	indirect	high	10	`0.6.4`
pyjwt	`2.10.1`	indirect	high	13	`2.13.0`
tmp	`0.2.5`	indirect	high	1	`0.2.6`
urllib3	`2.5.0`	indirect	high	8	`2.7.0`
ws	`8.18.3`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
requests	`2.32.5`	direct	moderate	2	`2.33.0`
idna	`3.11`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
pytest	`9.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
qs	`6.14.0`	indirect	moderate	3	`6.15.2`
rfc3161-client	`1.0.5`	indirect	moderate	2	`1.0.6`
setuptools	`80.9.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`
tuf	`6.0.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.0.0`
pygments	`2.19.2`	direct	low	2	`2.20.0`
body-parser	`2.2.1`	indirect	low	1	`2.3.0`
sigstore	`4.1.0`	indirect	low	2	`4.2.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records