Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 10:57 UTC

spiral / testing

Spiral Framework testing SDK

PHPMIT★ 7 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Feb 2022View on GitHub ↗

spiral/testing holds a health index of 28 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (79/100) and lowest on Security (23/100). It was last updated 106 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

28
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

28
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Spiral ScoutOrganization
338 followers90 public repossince Mar 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistspiral/testing3.0.0155,71233106 days agotestingspiralspiral-packages

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 106 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
9/18Commit volume9 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year9
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push106
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases33 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 106 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~58.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tag3.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release106
mean_days_between_releases58.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars7 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars7
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
69.2/80Monthly downloads155,712 downloads/month across packagist
11.8/20Registry dependents58 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesspiral/testing
dependents58
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads2,213,775
monthly_downloads155,712
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 60% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.598
How it's scored
25.2/42Issue resolution60% of issues closed
28.7/30PR acceptance65/68 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs65
open_issues8
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.6
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18.2/25Owner reach338 followers of spiral
25/25Track record90 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers338
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginspiral
public_repos90
account_age_days4,181
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 106 days ago
20/20Version history33 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspiral/testing
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish106

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://spiral.dev/docs/packages-testing
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, php7, spiral-framework, testing, testing-tools
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://spiral.dev/docs/packages-testing
docs_sitehttps://spiral.dev/docs/packages-testing
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

23At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.6
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier23
security_posture_before_jurisdiction46
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/92 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes13,164
source_files_sampled92
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
8contributors
9commits, last 12 months
106days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
8open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712022-062024-042026-03
Major 1Minor 13Patch 12

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 10:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistnyholm/psr7^1.8.2composer.json
Packagistmockery/mockery^1.6.12composer.json
Packagistspiral/auth^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/auth-http^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/boot^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/events^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/console^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/core^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/http^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/mailer^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/queue^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/session^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/security^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/tokenizer^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/storage^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/views^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/translator^3.16composer.json
Packagistspiral/scaffolder^3.16composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mime^6.4.18 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistmockery/mockerydirect
Packagistnyholm/psr7direct
Packagistspiral/authdirect
Packagistspiral/auth-httpdirect
Packagistspiral/bootdirect
Packagistspiral/consoledirect
Packagistspiral/coredirect
Packagistspiral/eventsdirect
Packagistspiral/httpdirect
Packagistspiral/mailerdirect
Packagistspiral/queuedirect
Packagistspiral/scaffolderdirect
Packagistspiral/securitydirect
Packagistspiral/sessiondirect
Packagistspiral/storagedirect
Packagistspiral/tokenizerdirect
Packagistspiral/translatordirect
Packagistspiral/viewsdirect
Packagistsymfony/mimedirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistspiral-packages/league-eventindirect
Packagistspiral/code-styleindirect
Packagistspiral/dumperindirect
Packagistspiral/frameworkindirect
Packagistspiral/nyholm-bridgeindirect
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-bridgeindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.