Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:17 UTC

spring-ai-community / spring-ai-session

Structured, event-sourced conversation memory layer for Spring AI applications.

JavaApache-2.0★ 54 stars⑂ 21 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗

spring-ai-community/spring-ai-session holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

777 followers30 public repossince Nov 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session0.10.0-520 days ago
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-jdbc0.10.0-1220 days ago
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-test0.10.0-120 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
16.6/18Commit volume — 70 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year70
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv0.10.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases15
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28/60Stars — 54 stars
10.8/25Forks — 21 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks21
stars54
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.9
How it's scored
19.6/42Issue resolution — 47% of issues closed
22.3/30PR acceptance — 29/39 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues16
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d18
issue_closed_ratio0.467
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.8/25Owner reach — 777 followers of spring-ai-community
14.6/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers777
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginspring-ai-community
public_repos30
account_age_days689

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 20 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session, org.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-jdbc, org.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-test
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://spring-ai-community.github.io/spring-ai-session/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://spring-ai-community.github.io/spring-ai-session/
docs_sitehttps://spring-ai-community.github.io/spring-ai-session/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind 3.1.5 (high 7.5)
10/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: tools.jackson.core:jackson-core 3.1.5 (high 7.5)
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages2
assessed_packages34
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the maven:org.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session@0.10.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 34 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.7/40Legible commit history — 39 of 70 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.557
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — auto-configurations/session/spring-ai-autoconfigure-session-jdbc/pom.xml, auto-configurations/session/spring-ai-autoconfigure-session/pom.xml, boot-starters/spring-ai-starter-session-jdbc/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2.9/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 70 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.014
toolchain_manifestsauto-configurations/session/spring-ai-autoconfigure-session-jdbc/pom.xml, auto-configurations/session/spring-ai-autoconfigure-session/pom.xml, boot-starters/spring-ai-starter-session-jdbc/pom.xml, pom.xml, spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml, spring-ai-session-jdbc/pom.xml, spring-ai-session-test/pom.xml, spring-ai-session/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/82 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes52,494
source_files_sampled82
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

54GitHub stars
7contributors
70commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
16open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 21 ⇿
0Stars
21Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242122026-042026-072026-10
Major 0Minor 8Patch 2
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:17 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-dependencies${spring-boot.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.ai:spring-ai-bom${spring-ai.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-jdbc${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session-test${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-autoconfigure-session${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-autoconfigure-session-jdbc${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-starter-session-jdbc${project.version}spring-ai-session-bom/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session${project.version}spring-ai-session-jdbc/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-jdbc—spring-ai-session-jdbc/pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind—spring-ai-session-jdbc/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session${project.version}spring-ai-session-test/pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api—spring-ai-session-test/pom.xml
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core—spring-ai-session-test/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.ai:spring-ai-model—spring-ai-session/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.ai:spring-ai-client-chat—spring-ai-session/pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind—spring-ai-session/pom.xml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing maven:org.springaicommunity:spring-ai-session@0.10.0 pulls in 34 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind3.1.5directhigh53.2.3
tools.jackson.core:jackson-core3.1.5indirecthigh23.2.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.