Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 10:38 UTC

spring-cloud / spring-cloud-build

Common build concerns, shared plugin configuration, etc. for Spring Cloud modules

ShellApache-2.0★ 225 stars⑂ 295 forkssince Oct 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

spring-cloud/spring-cloud-build holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Spring CloudOrganization
2,755 followers34 public repossince Jun 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools5.0.3-10130 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume337 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year337
human_commit_share0.72
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases32 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~34.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv5.0.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases34.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.1/60Stars225 stars
20.6/25Forks295 forks
8/15Watchers29 watchers
Inputs used
forks295
stars225
watchers29
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth35 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled35
top_contributor_share0.321
How it's scored
34.9/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
23.8/30PR acceptance456/576 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs456
open_issues18
closed_issues89
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.832
closed_unmerged_prs120
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
24.7/25Owner reach2,755 followers of spring-cloud
23.2/25Track record34 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,755
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginspring-cloud
public_repos34
account_age_days4,488

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history101 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, spring, spring-boot, spring-cloud, microservices, build, maven, spring-cloud-core
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
11/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils 3.3.0 (high)
34/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 178 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages33
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the maven:org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools@5.0.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 33 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.7/40Legible commit history32 of 72 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.444
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapdocs/pom.xml, pom.xml, spring-cloud-build-dependencies/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance25 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsdocs/pom.xml, pom.xml, spring-cloud-build-dependencies/pom.xml, spring-cloud-build-tools/pom.xml, spring-cloud-dependencies-parent/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.25
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeShell without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/6 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes5,212
source_files_sampled6
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

225GitHub stars
35contributors
337commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
32releases
2bus factor
18open issues
Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 295 ⇿
0Stars
295Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030029542014-112020-092026-08
Major 1Minor 2Patch 16

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 10:37 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-dependencies${spring-cloud-build.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle${puppycrawl-tools-checkstyle.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.spring.javaformat:spring-javaformat-checkstyle${spring-javaformat-checkstyle.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools${spring-cloud-build.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.spring.nohttp:nohttp-checkstyle${nohttp-checkstyle.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-maven-plugin${spring-boot.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-docs${spring-cloud-build.version}pom.xml
Mavenant-contrib:ant-contrib1.0b3pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.ant:ant${ant.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.tigris.antelope:antelopetasks${antelopetasks.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jruby:jruby-complete${jruby-complete.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj${asciidoctorj.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.pitest:pitest-junit5-plugin${pitest-junit5-plugin.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp-bom${okhttp.version}spring-cloud-build-dependencies/pom.xml
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle${puppycrawl-tools-checkstyle.version}spring-cloud-build-tools/pom.xml
All dependencies 69

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenant-contrib:ant-contrib1.0b3direct
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyledirect
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle12.1.2direct
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp-bom4.12.0direct
Mavenio.spring.javaformat:spring-javaformat-checkstyle0.0.48direct
Mavenio.spring.nohttp:nohttp-checkstyle0.0.11direct
Mavenorg.apache.ant:ant1.10.18direct
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctorjdirect
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj2.5.13direct
Mavenorg.jruby:jruby-complete9.4.9.0direct
Mavenorg.pitest:pitest-junit5-plugin0.16direct
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-maven-plugin4.2.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-dependencies5.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools5.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.tigris.antelope:antelopetasks3.2.10direct
Mavench.qos.logback:logback-classicindirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databindindirect
Mavenio.spring.javaformat:spring-javaformat-maven-plugin0.0.48indirect
Mavenio.spring.maven.antora:antora-component-version-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenio.spring.maven.antora:antora-component-version-maven-plugin0.0.4indirect
Mavenorg.antora:antora-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.antora:antora-maven-plugin1.0.0-alpha.5indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4jindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin3.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin3.7.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.14.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin3.9.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin3.1.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin2.10indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin3.6.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jxr-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin3.6.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-report-plugin2.22.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.basepom.maven:duplicate-finder-maven-plugin2.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.6.4indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-plugin1.7.3indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:license-maven-plugin2.7.1indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.m2e:lifecycle-mapping1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.15indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin2.4.10indirect
Mavenorg.pitest:pitest-mavenindirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4jindirect
Mavenorg.sonarsource.java:sonar-jacoco-listeners5.14.0.18788indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.9.0indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-testindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud :spring-cloud-build-docs 5.1.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-coreindirect
Mavenpl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-pluginindirect
Mavenpl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-plugin4.9.10indirect
npm@antora/atlas-extension1.0.0-alpha.5indirect
npm@antora/collector-extension1.0.3indirect
npm@asciidoctor/tabs1.0.0-beta.6indirect
npm@springio/antora-extensions1.14.13indirect
npm@springio/asciidoctor-extensions1.0.0-alpha.18indirect
npmantora3.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing maven:org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-build-tools@5.0.3 pulls in 33 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.3.0indirecthigh14.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.