Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-30 23:48 UTC

spring-projects / spring-data-redis

Provides support to increase developer productivity in Java when using Redis, a key-value store. Uses familiar Spring concepts such as a template classes for core API usage and lightweight repository style data access.

JavaApache-2.0★ 1,868 stars⑂ 1,267 forkssince Jul 2011View on GitHub ↗

spring-projects/spring-data-redis holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (62/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpringOrganization
16,783 followers77 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.springframework.data:spring-data-redis4.1.0-28936 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume199 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained26 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year199
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year44

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 36 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~11.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.5.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases11.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

91Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.1/60Stars1,868 stars
25/25Forks1,267 forks
11.9/15Watchers137 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,267
stars1,868
watchers137
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 49% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.489
How it's scored
39.4/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
2.6/30PR acceptance78/903 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs78
open_issues148
closed_issues2,295
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.939
closed_unmerged_prs825
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach16,783 followers of spring-projects
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers16,783
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginspring-projects
public_repos77
account_age_days5,875
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history289 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.springframework.data:spring-data-redis
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://spring.io/projects/spring-data-redis/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, redis, ddd, spring, spring-data, framework
has_wikino
homepagehttps://spring.io/projects/spring-data-redis/
docs_sitehttps://spring.io/projects/spring-data-redis/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained26 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:org.springframework.data:spring-data-redis@4.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 17 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
22.9/40Legible commit history43 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.43
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes11/966 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes185,319
source_files_sampled966
oversized_source_files11
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,868GitHub stars
99contributors
199commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
148open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,267 ⇿
0Stars
1,267Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,26782016-102021-092026-07
Major 1Minor 5Patch 72

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 23:47 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool2${pool}pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom${netty}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.data:spring-data-keyvalue${springdata.keyvalue}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-txpom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-oxmpom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aoppom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context-supportpom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-messagingpom.xml
Mavenredis.clients:jedis${jedis}pom.xml
Mavenio.lettuce:lettuce-core${lettuce}pom.xml
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-corepom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-corepom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databindpom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databindpom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotationspom.xml
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils${beanutils}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool2pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observationpom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracingpom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlibpom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflectpom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core${kotlin-coroutines}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactor${kotlin-coroutines}pom.xml
All dependencies 45

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotationsdirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-coredirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databinddirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310direct
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.11.0direct
Mavenio.lettuce:lettuce-core7.5.2.RELEASEdirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observationdirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracingdirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom4.2.10direct
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-coredirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool2direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool22.13.1direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflectdirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlibdirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-coredirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactordirect
Mavenorg.springframework.data:spring-data-keyvalue4.2.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aopdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context-supportdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-messagingdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-oxmdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-txdirect
Mavenredis.clients:jedis7.4.1direct
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databinddirect
Mavencom.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream1.4.21indirect
Mavenedu.umd.cs.mtc:MultithreadedTC1.01indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-testindirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-integration-testindirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-testindirect
Mavenio.mockk:mockk-jvmindirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-epollindirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-kqueueindirect
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-testindirect
Mavenjakarta.enterprise:jakarta.enterprise.cdi-apiindirect
Mavenorg.antora:antora-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin7.5.2.RELEASEindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-seindirect
Mavenorg.awaitility:awaitilityindirect
Mavenorg.msgpack:jackson-dataformat-msgpack0.9.11indirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core-testindirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-jdbcindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:org.springframework.data:spring-data-redis@4.1.0 pulls in 17 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.