Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:17 UTC

spring-projects / spring-hateoas

Spring HATEOAS - Library to support implementing representations for hyper-text driven REST web services.

JavaApache-2.0★ 1,089 stars⑂ 478 forkssince May 2012View on GitHub ↗

spring-projects/spring-hateoas holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpringOrganization · verified domain
17,072 followers76 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.springframework.hateoas:spring-hateoas3.2.0-M2-12625 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 120 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year120
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 59 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.2.0-M1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases15.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.3/60Stars — 1,089 stars
22.3/25Forks — 478 forks
11/15Watchers — 98 watchers
Inputs used
forks478
stars1,089
watchers98
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 63 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled63
top_contributor_share0.75
How it's scored
36.8/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
6/30PR acceptance — 80/399 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs80
open_issues264
closed_issues1,859
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.876
closed_unmerged_prs319
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 17,072 followers of spring-projects
25/25Track record — 76 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers17,072
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginspring-projects
public_repos76
account_age_days5,955

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 25 days ago
20/20Version history — 126 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.springframework.hateoas:spring-hateoas
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish25

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://spring.io/projects/spring-hateoas
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://spring.io/projects/spring-hateoas
docs_sitehttps://spring.io/projects/spring-hateoas
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:org.springframework.hateoas:spring-hateoas@3.2.0-M2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 17 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.94
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/375 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes43,060
source_files_sampled375
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,089GitHub stars
63contributors
120commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
264open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 478 ⇿
0Stars
478Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050047282012-052019-072026-10
Major 2Minor 8Patch 53

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:16 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj-diagram2.3.0pom.xml
Mavenio.spring.asciidoctor.backends:spring-asciidoctor-backends${spring-asciidoctor-backends.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-bom${reactor.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom${junit.version}pom.xml
Maventools.jackson:jackson-bom${jackson-bom.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-bom${kotlin.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-bom${kotlinx-coroutines.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib—pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect—pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactor—pom.xml
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aop${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-beans${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.plugin:spring-plugin-core${spring-plugin.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations—pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind—pom.xml
Mavencom.jayway.jsonpath:json-path${jsonpath.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.atteo:evo-inflector${evo.version}pom.xml
Mavenjakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-api3.0.2pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${slf4j.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-test${spring-framework.version}pom.xml
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 39 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations—direct
Mavencom.jayway.jsonpath:json-path2.10.0direct
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-bom2026.0.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenio.spring.asciidoctor.backends:spring-asciidoctor-backends0.0.7direct
Mavenjakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-api3.0.2direct
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj-diagram2.3.0direct
Mavenorg.atteo:evo-inflector1.3direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-bom2.4.20direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect—direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib—direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-bom1.11.0direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactor—direct
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0direct
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom6.1.3direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.20direct
Mavenorg.springframework.plugin:spring-plugin-core4.2.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aop7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-beans7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-test7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc7.1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind—direct
Maventools.jackson:jackson-bom3.1.7direct
Mavench.qos.logback:logback-classic1.6.5indirect
Mavencom.tngtech.archunit:archunit1.3.0indirect
Mavenio.mockk:mockk-jvm1.14.11indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor.addons:reactor-extra—indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty—indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-test—indirect
Mavenjakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api6.0.0indirect
Mavennet.jadler:jadler-all1.3.1indirect
Mavennet.javacrumbs.json-unit:json-unit-assertj4.1.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin3.7.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin2.36.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.13.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin3.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.4.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin3.1.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.asciidoctor:asciidoctor-maven-plugin3.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core3.27.7indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-plugin1.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator8.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin2.4.20indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test2.4.20indirect
Mavenorg.jfrog.buildinfo:artifactory-maven-plugin3.6.2indirect
Mavenorg.json:json20250517indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params—indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter2.28.2indirect
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok1.18.48indirect
Mavenorg.skyscreamer:jsonassert1.5.3indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j2.0.20indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.8.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:org.springframework.hateoas:spring-hateoas@3.2.0-M2 pulls in 17 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.