Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-17 17:39 UTC

spryker / asset-storage

[READ ONLY] Subtree split of the AssetStorage module.

PHPCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

spryker/asset-storage holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (86/100) and lowest on Security (1/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SprykerOrganization
113 followers1,334 public repossince Dec 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistspryker/asset-storage1.3.015,8646378 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

48Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume — 3 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 378 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~241.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tag1.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release378
mean_days_between_releases241.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

3Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

71Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
56/80Monthly downloads — 15,864 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesspryker/asset-storage
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,009,266
monthly_downloads15,864
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

89Excellent
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.185

Ownership & stewardship

87Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
14.8/25Owner reach — 113 followers of spryker
25/25Track record — 1,334 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers113
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginspryker
public_repos1,334
account_age_days4,267
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 378 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspryker/asset-storage
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish378

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://spryker.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://spryker.com
docs_sitehttps://spryker.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

1Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestscomposer.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

31At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.3/40Legible commit history — 17 of 29 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.586
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 29
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/54 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes11,238
source_files_sampled54
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
17contributors
3commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
6releases
6bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (Skipping github.com/spryker/asset-storage: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: non-200 OK status code: 503 Service Unavailable body: "{\"message\": \"No server is currently available to service your request. Sorry about that. Please try resubmitting your request and contact us if the problem persists.\"}\r\n"); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistspryker/asset^1.4.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/kernel^3.30.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/propel-orm^1.3.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/publisher-extension^1.0.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/storage^3.0.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/store^1.0.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/synchronization^1.0.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/synchronization-behavior^1.0.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/synchronization-extension^1.1.0composer.json
Packagistspryker/transfer^3.27.0composer.json
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistspryker/asset—direct
Packagistspryker/kernel—direct
Packagistspryker/propel-orm—direct
Packagistspryker/publisher-extension—direct
Packagistspryker/storage—direct
Packagistspryker/store—direct
Packagistspryker/synchronization—direct
Packagistspryker/synchronization-behavior—direct
Packagistspryker/synchronization-extension—direct
Packagistspryker/transfer—direct
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistspryker/code-sniffer—indirect
Packagistspryker/event—indirect
Packagistspryker/event-behavior—indirect
Packagistspryker/propel—indirect
Packagistspryker/publisher—indirect
Packagistspryker/queue—indirect
Packagistspryker/testify—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with spryker/asset-storage. Read them side by side →

99stripe/stripe-phpPHP library for the Stripe API. Exceptional99grpc/grpcC++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)Exceptional99WordPress/gutenbergThe Block Editor project for WordPress and beyond. Plugin is available from the official repository.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional98swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.