Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 19:18 UTC

squakez / camel-k

Apache Camel K is a lightweight integration platform, born on Kubernetes, with serverless superpowers

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Sep 2020forkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

squakez/camel-k holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pasquale CongiustiPersonal account
14 followers68 public repossince Oct 2016Red Hat

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/apache/camel-k/v2points to another repo — not scoredv2.11.0-3713 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 15 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume497 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year497
human_commit_share0.52
days_since_last_push15
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases49 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,203 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~49.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv1.12.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,203
mean_days_between_releases49.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 25% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.252
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
1/30PR acceptance8/234 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs226
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.5/25Owner reach14 followers of squakez
25/25Track record68 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsquakez
public_repos68
account_age_days3,604
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows17 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://camel.apache.org
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://camel.apache.org
docs_sitehttps://camel.apache.org
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://camel.apache.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history52 of 52 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://camel.apache.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,855
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, script/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance31 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, script/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, script/camel-k-runtime-archetype/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.31
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes2/850 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes99,411
source_files_sampled850
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
98contributors
497commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
49releases
3bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/apache/camel-k/v2' points at a different repository (https://github.com/apache/camel-k); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.apache.camel.k.integration:camel-k-integration' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 19:18 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 52
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semverv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patchv5.9.11+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gertd/go-pluralizev0.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v72v72.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoffv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.18.11go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-shellwordsv1.0.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.42.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/openshift/apiv0.0.0-20250820105013-6282350d0c39go.mod
Gogithub.com/operator-framework/apiv0.45.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoringv0.93.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.24.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.70.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/xidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stoewer/go-strcasev1.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/automaxprocsv1.6.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.3go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.3go.mod
Gok8s.io/cli-runtimev0.36.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.3go.mod
Gok8s.io/gengov0.0.0-20251215205346-5ee0d033ba5bgo.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20260507154919-ff6756f316d2go.mod
Goknative.dev/eventingv0.50.0go.mod
Goknative.dev/pkgv0.0.0-20260727151759-521cb33b33ddgo.mod
Goknative.dev/servingv0.50.0go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.24.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/gateway-apiv1.6.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6v6.4.2go.mod
Mavenorg.apache.camel.k:camel-k-runtime-bom${runtime.version}script/camel-k-runtime-archetype/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.camel.quarkus:camel-quarkus-corescript/camel-k-runtime-archetype/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.camel.k:camel-k-runtimescript/camel-k-runtime-archetype/pom.xml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.