Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-18 21:52 UTC

square / square-dotnet-sdk

.NET client library for the Square API

C#MIT★ 70 stars⑂ 32 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗

square/square-dotnet-sdk holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SquareOrganization
2,964 followers295 public repossince May 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSquare46.1.0-840 days agosquareblockpaymentsposcommercecredit-cardpayment-processingpoint-of-salemerchanttransaction
NuGetSquare.Legacy40.1.0-1517 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume12 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share0.79
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases87 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~40.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count87
latest_release_tag46.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases40.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29.8/60Stars70 stars
12.4/25Forks32 forks
5.8/15Watchers12 watchers
Inputs used
forks32
stars70
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
65.2/80Total downloads1,889,803 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSquare
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,889,803
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excludedSquare.Legacy
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

92Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.199
How it's scored
41/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance120/140 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs120
open_issues1
closed_issues43
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.977
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach2,964 followers of square
25/25Track record295 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,964
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginsquare
public_repos295
account_age_days6,310
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history84 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSquare, Square.Legacy
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://developer.squareup.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssdk, api-client
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://developer.squareup.com
docs_sitehttps://developer.squareup.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
2/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 16 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27/40Legible commit history40 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.506
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstraplegacy/Square.Legacy.Tests/Square.Legacy.Tests.csproj, legacy/Square.Legacy/Square.Legacy.csproj, src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
6/10Demonstrated agent practice3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestslegacy/Square.Legacy.Tests/Square.Legacy.Tests.csproj, legacy/Square.Legacy/Square.Legacy.csproj, src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj, src/Square/Square.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes2/3,311 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes72,609
source_files_sampled3,311
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

70GitHub stars
22contributors
12commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
87releases
4bus factor
1open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 32 ⇿
0Stars
32Forks
83Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383122020-032023-052026-08
Major 39Minor 30Patch 13

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-18 21:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests14 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
4SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0legacy/Square.Legacy.Tests/Square.Legacy.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.3legacy/Square.Legacy.Tests/Square.Legacy.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.1legacy/Square.Legacy.Tests/Square.Legacy.Tests.csproj
NuGetAPIMatic.Core[0.4.5, 0.5.0)legacy/Square.Legacy/Square.Legacy.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0legacy/Square.Legacy/Square.Legacy.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode1.1.1legacy/Square.Legacy/Square.Legacy.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.13.0src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.3.2src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.0.0src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.6.0src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetWireMock.Net1.7.4src/Square.Test/Square.Test.csproj
NuGetPortable.System.DateTimeOnly8.0.2src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetOneOf3.0.271src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetOneOf.Extended3.0.271src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http[4.3.4,)src/Square/Square.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions[4.3.1,)src/Square/Square.csproj
All dependencies 19

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAPIMatic.Coredirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode1.1.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.13.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.13.3direct
NuGetNUnit4.3.2direct
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.6.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.1direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.0.0direct
NuGetOneOf3.0.271direct
NuGetOneOf.Extended3.0.271direct
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0direct
NuGetPortable.System.DateTimeOnly8.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Httpdirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5direct
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressionsdirect
NuGetWireMock.Net1.7.4direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 16 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.