Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 21:08 UTC

stac-utils / rustac

The power of Rust for the STAC ecosystem

RustApache-2.0★ 145 stars⑂ 24 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#geospatial#raster#stac#command-line#earth-observation#metadata#rust#python#server

stac-utils/rustac holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (66/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

stac-utilsOrganization
216 followers40 public repossince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIrustac0.9.179,3533628 days agostacgeospatial

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

98Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 242 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year242
human_commit_share0.24
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagstac-extensions-v0.1.16
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release11
mean_days_between_releases0.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak
How it's scored
35/60Stars — 145 stars
11.3/25Forks — 24 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks24
stars145
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges18
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
52.9/80Monthly downloads — 9,353 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrustac
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,353
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.978

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
38/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance — 719/854 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs719
open_issues24
closed_issues226
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.904
closed_unmerged_prs135
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.8/25Owner reach — 216 followers of stac-utils
23.7/25Track record — 40 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers216
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginstac-utils
public_repos40
account_age_days2,489

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 28 days ago
20/20Version history — 36 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrustac
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish28

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://stac-utils.github.io/rustac/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgeospatial, raster, stac, command-line, earth-observation, metadata, rust, python, server
has_wikino
homepagehttps://stac-utils.github.io/rustac/
docs_sitehttps://stac-utils.github.io/rustac/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages6
assessed_packages283
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 3, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 283 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 24 of 24 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,178

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

87Excellent
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/cli/Cargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 68 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/cli/Cargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml, crates/derive/Cargo.toml, crates/duckdb/Cargo.toml, crates/extensions/Cargo.toml, crates/io/Cargo.toml, crates/server/Cargo.toml, crates/validate/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.68

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/84 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes39,569
source_files_sampled84
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — crates/server/src/openapi.yaml
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filescrates/server/src/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

145GitHub stars
13contributors
242commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
24open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 24 ⇿
0Stars
24Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242412022-032024-032026-04
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 21:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 1/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 299

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 299 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioconsole_error_panic_hook—indirect
crates.iogetrandom—indirect
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen—indirect
crates.iostac—indirect
crates.iostac-derive—indirect
crates.iostac-duckdb—indirect
crates.iostac-io—indirect
crates.iostac-server—indirect
crates.iostac-validate—indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen—indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-test—indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.28.6indirect
npm@duckdb/duckdb-wasm1.32.0indirect
npm@duckdb/duckdb-wasm^1.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.3indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@npmcli/agent4.0.0indirect
npm@npmcli/fs5.0.0indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.18indirect
npm@testing-library/dom10.4.1indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event14.6.1indirect
npm@types/aria-query5.0.4indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/command-line-args5.2.3indirect
npm@types/command-line-usage5.0.4indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node20.19.33indirect
npm@vitest/browser3.2.7indirect
npm@vitest/expect3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/mocker3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/mocker3.2.7indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format3.2.7indirect
npm@vitest/runner3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/spy3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/spy3.2.7indirect
npm@vitest/utils3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/utils3.2.7indirect
npmabbrev4.0.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles5.2.0indirect
npmapache-arrow17.0.0indirect
npmapache-arrow18.1.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.0indirect
npmarray-back3.1.0indirect
npmarray-back6.2.2indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.3indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmcacache20.0.3indirect
npmchai5.3.3indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchalk-template0.4.0indirect
npmcheck-error2.1.3indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommand-line-args5.2.1indirect
npmcommand-line-usage7.0.3indirect
npmcopy-webpack-plugin^5.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-eql5.0.2indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdom-accessibility-api0.5.16indirect
npmencoding0.1.13indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerr-code2.0.3indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.7.0indirect
npmesbuild0.27.3indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmexponential-backoff3.1.3indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfind-replace3.0.0indirect
npmflatbuffers24.12.23indirect
npmfs-minipass3.0.3indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-cache-semantics4.2.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmiconv-lite0.6.3indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmip-address10.4.0indirect
npmisexe4.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens9.0.1indirect
npmjson-bignum0.0.3indirect
npmlodash.camelcase4.3.0indirect
npmloupe3.2.1indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.6indirect
npmlz-string1.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmake-fetch-happen15.0.3indirect
npmminimatch10.2.4indirect
npmminipass3.3.6indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmminipass-collect2.0.1indirect
npmminipass-fetch5.0.1indirect
npmminipass-flush1.0.5indirect
npmminipass-pipeline1.2.4indirect
npmminipass-sized2.0.0indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmnode-gyp12.2.0indirect
npmnopt9.0.0indirect
npmp-map7.0.4indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpathval2.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplaywright1.58.2indirect
npmplaywright-core1.58.2indirect
npmpostcss8.5.24indirect
npmpretty-format27.5.1indirect
npmproc-log6.1.0indirect
npmpromise-retry2.0.1indirect
npmreact-is17.0.2indirect
npmretry0.12.0indirect
npmrollup4.59.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsmart-buffer4.2.0indirect
npmsocks2.8.7indirect
npmsocks-proxy-agent8.0.5indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmssri13.0.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env3.10.0indirect
npmstrip-literal3.1.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtable-layout4.1.1indirect
npmtar7.5.22indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtinypool1.1.1indirect
npmtinyrainbow2.0.0indirect
npmtinyspy4.0.4indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypical4.0.0indirect
npmtypical7.3.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmunique-filename5.0.0indirect
npmunique-slug6.0.0indirect
npmvite7.3.5indirect
npmvite-node3.2.4indirect
npmvite-plugin-wasm3.5.0indirect
npmvitest3.2.6indirect
npmwebpack^5.99.8indirect
npmwebpack-cli^6.0.1indirect
npmwebpack-dev-server^5.2.1indirect
npmwhich6.0.1indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwordwrapjs5.1.1indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs6.1indirect
PyPIcachebox5.2.3indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.7.1indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIciso86012.3.3indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcssselect20.8.0indirect
PyPIdeepdiff9.1.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIgeopandas1.1.2indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-redirects1.2.3indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.5indirect
PyPIorderly-set5.5.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.6indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIproperdocs1.6.7indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyogrio0.12.0indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpystac1.14.1indirect
PyPIpystac-client0.9.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.29.0indirect
PyPIrustac0.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIstac-api-validator0.6.8indirect
PyPIstac-check1.11.1indirect
PyPIstac-geoparquet0.8.1indirect
PyPIstac-validator3.10.2indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItypes-psutil7.2.2.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 283 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
click8.3.1indirecthigh18.3.3
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
@vitest/mocker3.2.6indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
@vitest/mocker3.2.7indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
vitest3.2.6indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
esbuild0.27.3indirectlow10.28.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with stac-utils/rustac. Read them side by side →

99apache/datafusionApache DataFusion SQL Query EngineExceptional99Qiskit/qiskitQiskit is an open-source SDK for working with quantum computers at the level of extended quantum circuits, operators, and primitives.Exceptional99astral-sh/ruffAn extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional99nautechsystems/nautilus_traderProduction-grade Rust-native trading engine with deterministic event-driven architectureExceptional98pola-rs/polarsExtremely fast Query Engine for DataFrames, written in RustExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.