Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 19:14 UTC

stackblitz / alien-signals

👾 The lightest signal library

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 3,244 stars⑂ 121 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗

stackblitz/alien-signals holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated 99 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StackBlitzOrganization · verified domain
3,920 followers53 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmalien-signals3.2.132,591,12781126 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 99 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18Commit volume — 76 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year76
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push99
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 3 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 128 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~241.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv3.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release128
mean_days_between_releases241.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57/60Stars — 3,244 stars
17.3/25Forks — 121 forks
7.9/15Watchers — 27 watchers
Inputs used
forks121
stars3,244
watchers27
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadgen.net
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 32,591,127 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesalien-signals
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads32,591,127
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.952
How it's scored
39.4/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 55/73 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs55
open_issues3
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.939
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,920 followers of stackblitz
24.6/25Track record — 53 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,920
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginstackblitz
public_repos53
account_age_days3,415

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 126 days ago
20/20Version history — 81 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesalien-signals
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish126

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://npmjs.com/package/alien-signals
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://npmjs.com/package/alien-signals
docs_sitehttps://npmjs.com/package/alien-signals
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages6
assessed_packages91
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 91 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.87
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes9,953
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3,244GitHub stars
25contributors
76commits, last 12 months
99days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 121 ⇿
0Stars
121Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512162024-102025-092026-09
Major 2Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 19:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
4CI-Tests6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 91 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.129.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tsslint/cli3.1.2indirect
npm@tsslint/config3.1.2indirect
npm@tsslint/core3.1.2indirect
npm@tsslint/types3.1.2indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.6indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.6indirect
npm@volar/language-core2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/language-hub0.0.1indirect
npm@volar/source-map2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/typescript2.4.28indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmmitata1.0.34indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmpath-browserify1.0.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.14indirect
npmreactive-framework-test-suite0.0.2indirect
npmrolldown1.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmvite8.0.12indirect
npmvitest4.1.6indirect
npmvscode-uri3.1.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 91 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.6indirecthigh35.0.9
nanoid3.3.12indirecthigh25.1.16
postcss8.5.14indirecthigh28.5.23
vite8.0.12indirecthigh28.0.16
@vitest/mocker4.1.6indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
vitest4.1.6indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.