Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-02 14:27 UTC

stacksjs / ts-audio

🎵 Powerful audio processing for your media workflows.

TypeScriptMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2025View on GitHub ↗

#audio #bun #ffmpeg #optimization #processing #cli #library #typescript

stacksjs/ts-audio holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (77/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (49/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StacksOrganization

119 followers153 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@ts-audio/aac	0.1.1	4,964	1	10 days ago	aac adts audio codec typescript zero-dependency
npm	@ts-audio/mp3	0.1.1	4,963	1	10 days ago	mp3 audio codec id3 typescript zero-dependency
npm	@ts-audio/ogg	0.1.1	4,658	1	10 days ago	ogg vorbis opus audio container typescript zero-dependency
npm	@ts-audio/wav	0.1.1	4,667	1	10 days ago	wav wave riff audio pcm typescript zero-dependency
npm	@ts-audio/flac	0.1.1	4,963	1	10 days ago	flac lossless audio codec typescript zero-dependency
npm	@ts-audio/core	0.1.1	6,320	1	10 days ago	audio media codec demuxer muxer mp3 wav aac flac ogg typescript zero-dependency

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
14.5/36	Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
17.8/18	Commit volume — 94 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	94
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	21

Release discipline

68Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 2 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
5.4/27	Release cadence — a release every ~542 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	2
latest_release_tag	v-audio-0.1.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	10
mean_days_between_releases	542

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
0/25	Forks — 1 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1
stars	8
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

75Good

How it's scored

59.8/80	Monthly downloads — 30,535 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@ts-audio/aac, @ts-audio/mp3, @ts-audio/ogg, @ts-audio/wav, @ts-audio/flac, @ts-audio/core
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	30,535

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

53Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.454

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
0.3/30	PR acceptance — 21/2,498 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	21
open_issues	3
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0
closed_unmerged_prs	2,477
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
14.9/25	Owner reach — 119 followers of stacksjs
20.7/25	Track record — 153 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	119
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	stacksjs
public_repos	153
account_age_days	1,403

Package maintenance

84Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@ts-audio/aac, @ts-audio/mp3, @ts-audio/ogg, @ts-audio/wav, @ts-audio/flac, @ts-audio/core
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://stacks-audiox.netlify.app
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	audio, bun, ffmpeg, optimization, processing, cli, library, typescript
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://stacks-audiox.netlify.app
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): ci_tests, packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	1,475

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

49Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
0/10	Reproducible environment
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/41 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	24,577
source_files_sampled	41
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

8GitHub stars

4contributors

94commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

2releases

2bus factor

3open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10

5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 14:27 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 4

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@stacksjs/clapp	`^0.2.0`	indirect
npm	better-dx	`^0.2.15`	indirect
npm	better-dx	`^0.2.5`	indirect
npm	bun-plugin-dtsx	`^0.9.9`	indirect

Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records