Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 05:43 UTC

stargate / data-api

JSON document API for Apache Cassandra (formerly known as JSON API)

JavaApache-2.0★ 20 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

stargate/data-api holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (58/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StargateOrganization
69 followers12 public repossince Aug 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume198 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year198
human_commit_share0.8
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases78 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count78
latest_release_tagv1.0.53
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases18.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.7/60Stars20 stars
11.5/25Forks25 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars20
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth18 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.38
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution87% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance1,331/1,513 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,331
open_issues138
closed_issues897
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs182
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.3/25Owner reach69 followers of stargate
20.1/25Track record12 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers69
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginstargate
public_repos12
account_age_days2,235

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://stargate.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, cassandra, json, java, javascript
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://stargate.io
docs_sitehttps://stargate.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages27
unassessed_packages32
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 27 resolved dependencies against OSV. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history74 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.925
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes13/1,186 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes112,053
source_files_sampled1,186
oversized_source_files13
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/main/proto/embedding_gateway.proto
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/main/proto/embedding_gateway.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

20GitHub stars
18contributors
198commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
78releases
2bus factor
138open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'io.stargate:sgv2-jsonapi' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
58Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05101520252552023-102025-032026-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 48

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 05:43 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Maven${quarkus.platform.group-id}:${quarkus.platform.artifact-id}${quarkus.platform.version}pom.xml
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:bom2.26.31pom.xml
Mavenio.quarkiverse.mcp:quarkus-mcp-server-bom1.13.0pom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-arcpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-cachepom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-container-image-dockerpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-healthpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-openapipom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-fault-tolerancepom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-securitypom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-grpcpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-config-yamlpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-micrometer-registry-prometheuspom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-rest-client-jacksonpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-restpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-rest-jacksonpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-validatorpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-logging-jsonpom.xml
Mavenio.quarkiverse.mcp:quarkus-mcp-server-httppom.xml
Mavenjakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-apipom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.19.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text1.14.0pom.xml
Mavencom.bpodgursky:jbool_expressions1.23pom.xml
Mavencom.github.ben-manes.caffeine:caffeinepom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guavapom.xml
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:bedrockruntimepom.xml
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:stspom.xml
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:s3pom.xml
Mavencom.datastax.oss:java-driver-core${driver.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.datastax.oss:java-driver-metrics-micrometer${driver.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.cassandra:java-driver-query-builder4.19.0-preview1pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yamlpom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.uuid:java-uuid-generator5.1.1pom.xml
Mavenorg.mongodb:bson5.0.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0pom.xml
Mavenme.fabriciorby:maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter1.5.1pom.xml
All dependencies 59

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 36 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.bpodgursky:jbool_expressions1.23direct
Mavencom.datastax.oss:java-driver-core4.17.0direct
Mavencom.datastax.oss:java-driver-metrics-micrometer4.17.0direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yamldirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.uuid:java-uuid-generator5.1.1direct
Mavencom.github.ben-manes.caffeine:caffeinedirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guavadirect
Mavenio.quarkiverse.mcp:quarkus-mcp-server-bom1.13.0direct
Mavenio.quarkiverse.mcp:quarkus-mcp-server-httpdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-arcdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-cachedirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-config-yamldirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-container-image-dockerdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-grpcdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-hibernate-validatordirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-logging-jsondirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-micrometer-registry-prometheusdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-restdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-rest-client-jacksondirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-rest-jacksondirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-securitydirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-fault-tolerancedirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-healthdirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-smallrye-openapidirect
Mavenjakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-apidirect
Mavenme.fabriciorby:maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter1.5.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.cassandra:java-driver-query-builder4.19.0-preview1direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.19.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text1.14.0direct
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0direct
Mavenorg.mongodb:bson5.0.0direct
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:bedrockruntimedirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:bom2.26.31direct
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:s3direct
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:stsdirect
Mavenau.com.acegi:xml-format-maven-plugin3.2.2indirect
Mavencom.adobe.testing:s3mock-testcontainers5.1.0indirect
Mavencom.github.docker-java:docker-java-apiindirect
Mavencom.github.javafaker:javafaker1.0.2indirect
Mavencom.spotify.fmt:fmt-maven-plugin2.23indirect
Mavenio.quarkiverse.mcp:quarkus-mcp-server-testindirect
Mavenio.quarkus.platform:quarkus-bom3.38.1indirect
Mavenio.quarkus.platform:quarkus-maven-plugin3.38.1indirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-jacocoindirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-junit5indirect
Mavenio.quarkus:quarkus-junit5-mockitoindirect
Mavenio.rest-assured:rest-assuredindirect
Mavenio.smallrye:jandex-maven-plugin3.1.6indirect
Mavenme.fabriciorby:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.3indirect
Mavennet.javacrumbs.json-unit:json-unit2.35.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core3.27.7indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.12indirect
Mavenorg.junit-pioneer:junit-pioneer2.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter5.21.0indirect
Mavenorg.testcontainers:testcontainers-junit-jupiterindirect
Mavenorg.wiremock:wiremock3.4.2indirect
Mavenuk.org.webcompere:system-stubs-jupiter2.1.8indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 27 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.