Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 13:18 UTC

starkinfra / sdk-node

SDK to facilitate Node integrations with the Stark Infra API

JavaScriptMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗

starkinfra/sdk-node holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (34/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

STARK INFRAOrganization
20 followers18 public repossince Nov 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmstarkinfra0.20.04,7602783 days agoecdsasignaturesdkstarkstarkinfraopenbanking

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18Commit volume — 82 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year82
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 83 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~48.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.20.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release83
mean_days_between_releases48.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49/80Monthly downloads — 4,760 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesstarkinfra
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,760
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.256
How it's scored
10.5/42Issue resolution — 25% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance — 81/87 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs81
open_issues3
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.25
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of starkinfra
19.1/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginstarkinfra
public_repos18
account_age_days1,791

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 83 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesstarkinfra
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish83

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 61 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages36
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:starkinfra@0.20.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 36 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.starkinfra.com/llms.txt)
24.5/40Legible commit history — 46 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.starkinfra.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.46
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/332 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes17,207
source_files_sampled332
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3GitHub stars
20contributors
82commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
25releases
4bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
19Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212022-072024-062026-06
Major 0Minor 14Patch 5

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 13:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities61 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmaxios^1.6.2package.json
npmstarkbank-ecdsa^1.2.0package.json
npmstarkcore^0.3.0package.json
All dependencies 96

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 93 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmaxios1.6.2direct
npmstarkbank-ecdsa1.2.0direct
npmstarkcore0.3.0direct
npm@ungap/promise-all-settled1.1.2indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbig-integer1.6.51indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.3.3indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdiff5.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmenum3.0.4indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.15.6indirect
npmform-data4.0.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob7.2.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgrowl1.10.5indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-sha2560.9.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch4.2.1indirect
npmmocha9.2.2indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.1indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmutf83.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool6.2.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.4indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:starkinfra@0.20.0 pulls in 36 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.