Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 00:39 UTC

steadybit / extension-stackstate

GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

steadybit/extension-stackstate holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SteadybitOrganization · verified domain

20 followers79 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/steadybit/extension-stackstate	v1.0.36	-	37	6 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 6 days ago
26.3/36	Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 145 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	145
human_commit_share	0.56
days_since_last_push	6
active_weeks_last_year	38

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 80 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~3.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	80
latest_release_tag	steadybit-extension-stackstate-1.1.40
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	6
mean_days_between_releases	3.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	0
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

51Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 49% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.491

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.4/30	PR acceptance — 147/161 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	147
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	14
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

84Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
9.5/25	Owner reach — 20 followers of steadybit
25/25	Track record — 79 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	20
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	steadybit
public_repos	79
account_age_days	2,623

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20	Version history — 37 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/steadybit/extension-stackstate
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	102
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 102 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.steadybit.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 56 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.steadybit.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 16 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.16

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	16,389
source_files_sampled	10
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

0GitHub stars

6contributors

145commits, last 12 months

6days since last push

80releases

2bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10

5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 00:39 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 13

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/KimMachineGun/automemlimit	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-resty/resty/v2	`v2.17.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rs/zerolog	`v1.35.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_api/v2	`v2.10.6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_sdk	`v1.4.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_test	`v1.4.12`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_api	`v1.7.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_commons	`v0.3.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_sdk	`v1.4.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_test	`v1.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/steadybit/extension-kit	`v1.12.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.12.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 102

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 89 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/go-resty/resty/v2	`v2.17.2`	direct
Go	github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/kimmachinegun/automemlimit	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/rs/zerolog	`v1.35.1`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_api/v2	`v2.10.6`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_sdk	`v1.4.1`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/action-kit/go/action_kit_test	`v1.4.12`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_api	`v1.7.2`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_commons	`v0.3.2`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_sdk	`v1.4.2`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/discovery-kit/go/discovery_kit_test	`v1.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/steadybit/extension-kit	`v1.12.1`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.12.1`	direct
Go	github.com/antlr4-go/antlr/v4	`v4.13.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/apapsch/go-jsonmerge/v2	`v2.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5	`v5.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc`	indirect
Go	github.com/elastic/go-sysinfo	`v1.15.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/elastic/go-windows	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3	`v3.13.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/felixge/httpsnoop	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2	`v2.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/getkin/kin-openapi	`v0.149.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/cmdutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/conv	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/fileutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/jsonutils	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/loading	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/mangling	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/netutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/pools	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/stringutils	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/typeutils	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag/yamlutils	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/gnostic-models	`v0.7.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.4-0.20250319132907-e064f32e3674`	indirect
Go	github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2	`v2.30.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.20.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/moby/spdystream	`v0.5.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/concurrent	`v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/reflect2	`v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31ee`	indirect
Go	github.com/munnerz/goautoneg	`v0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822`	indirect
Go	github.com/oapi-codegen/runtime	`v1.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/oasdiff/yaml	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/oasdiff/yaml3	`v0.0.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/pbnjay/memory	`v0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.21.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/rs/xid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6	`v6.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/objx	`v0.5.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/x448/float16	`v0.8.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/yalp/jsonpath	`v0.0.0-20180802001716-5cc68e5049a0`	indirect
Go	github.com/zmwangx/debounce	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp	`v0.71.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.46.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v2	`v2.4.4`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.5`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20260813180055-c1d0aacb2297`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.61.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.24.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.49.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.43.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`v0.15.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api	`v0.0.0-20260819154853-08b0e4226688`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260819154853-08b0e4226688`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.83.2`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.12`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4	`v4.13.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/inf.v0	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	howett.net/plist	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/api	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/apimachinery	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/client-go	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/klog/v2	`v2.140.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/kube-openapi	`v0.0.0-20260721132016-d427ff9ee9ad`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/streaming	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	k8s.io/utils	`v0.0.0-20260626114624-be93311217bd`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/json	`v0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/randfill	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6	`v6.4.2`	indirect
Go	sigs.k8s.io/yaml	`v1.6.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 102 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records