Public recordCritical
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-25 08:34 UTC
stellar-deprecated / stellard
INACTIVE. Server in the Stellar network. Maintains the distributed ledger. Introduces and validates transactions. This repo is not in active development, it is being replaced by stellar-core.
stellar-deprecated/stellard holds a health index of 15 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (60/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.
15
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
15
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Stellar (Deprecated Repositories)Organization · verified domain
8 followers81 public repossince Sep 2019
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
18
Development activity
1Critical
Abandonment alert
Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it
archived on GitHub by its maintainersOverall rating: Critical ceiling
Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.
How abandonment is assessedHow it's scored
| 0/36 | Push recency — last push 4,054 days ago |
| 0/36 | Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits |
| 0/18 | Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 0 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 4,054 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 0 |
Release discipline
44Weak
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 1 releases published |
| 0/36 | Release recency — latest release 4,277 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release) |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 1 |
| latest_release_tag | 0.28.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 4,277 |
| mean_days_between_releases | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
49
Popularity & adoption
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 39.3/60 | Stars — 267 stars |
| 14.7/25 | Forks — 59 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 2 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 59 |
| stars | 267 |
| watchers | 2 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
44Weak
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 1 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | travis-ci.org |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
58
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 10.3/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 46 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 46 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.54 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
53Moderate
How it's scored
| 18.9/42 | Issue resolution — 45% of issues closed |
| 24.6/30 | PR acceptance — 68/83 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 3/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 68 |
| open_issues | 62 |
| closed_issues | 51 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.451 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 15 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
82Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 6.9/25 | Owner reach — 8 followers of stellar-deprecated |
| 25/25 | Track record — 81 public repos, account ~7 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 8 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | stellar-deprecated |
| public_repos | 81 |
| account_age_days | 2,570 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
40
Engineering practices
24At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
65Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
42
Security posture
27At Risk
How it's scored
| 6.8/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 1.5/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — project is archived |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 14 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 4 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2.7 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 4 |
| unassessed_packages | 12 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 4 resolved dependencies against OSV. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
60
Agent context & guidance
20At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 19.7/40 | Legible commit history — 37 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.37 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — src/beast/beast/http/impl/http-parser/Makefile, src/leveldb/Makefile, src/protobuf/examples/Makefile, src/protobuf/more_tests/Makefile, src/ripple/rocksdb/rocksdb/Makefile, src/websocket/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/broadcast_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/broadcast_server_tls/vendor/flot/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/chat_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/chat_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/concurrent_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/fuzzing_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/fuzzing_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/stress_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/telemetry_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/wsperf/Makefile, src/websocket/src/sha1/Makefile, src/websocket/test/basic/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — C++ (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | src/beast/beast/http/impl/http-parser/Makefile, src/leveldb/Makefile, src/protobuf/examples/Makefile, src/protobuf/more_tests/Makefile, src/ripple/rocksdb/rocksdb/Makefile, src/websocket/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/broadcast_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/broadcast_server_tls/vendor/flot/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/chat_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/chat_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/concurrent_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/echo_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/fuzzing_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/fuzzing_server_tls/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/stress_client/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/telemetry_server/Makefile, src/websocket/examples/wsperf/Makefile, src/websocket/src/sha1/Makefile, src/websocket/test/basic/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | src/protobuf/java/pom.xml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed) |
| 54.2/55 | Manageable file sizes — 32/2,161 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | C++ |
| largest_source_bytes | 5,175,878 |
| source_files_sampled | 2,161 |
| oversized_source_files | 32 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 40/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — src/protobuf/benchmarks/google_size.proto, src/protobuf/benchmarks/google_speed.proto, src/protobuf/examples/addressbook.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/multiple_files_test.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_builders_test.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_extension.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_extension_lite.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/non_nested_extension.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/non_nested_extension_lite.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/factory_test1.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/factory_test2.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_extensions.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_extensions_dynamic.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_messages.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/compiler/plugin.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_custom_options.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_embed_optimize_for.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_empty.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_enormous_descriptor.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_public.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_public_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_lite_imports_nonlite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_mset.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_no_generic_services.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_optimize_for.proto, src/ripple/proto/ripple.proto |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | src/protobuf/benchmarks/google_size.proto, src/protobuf/benchmarks/google_speed.proto, src/protobuf/examples/addressbook.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/multiple_files_test.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_builders_test.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_extension.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/nested_extension_lite.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/non_nested_extension.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/non_nested_extension_lite.proto, src/protobuf/java/src/test/java/com/google/protobuf/test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/factory_test1.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/factory_test2.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_extensions.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_extensions_dynamic.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/more_messages.proto, src/protobuf/python/google/protobuf/internal/test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_test_bad_identifiers.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/compiler/plugin.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_custom_options.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_embed_optimize_for.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_empty.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_enormous_descriptor.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_public.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_import_public_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_lite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_lite_imports_nonlite.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_mset.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_no_generic_services.proto, src/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/unittest_optimize_for.proto, src/ripple/proto/ripple.proto |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
267GitHub stars
46contributors
0commits, last 12 months
4,054days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
62open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 59 ⇿
0Stars
59Forks
1Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0
Each point covers 9 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 9 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 2 | Code-Review | Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | project is archived |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 7
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | async | ~0.9.0 | package.json |
| npm | extend | ~1.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | simple-jsonrpc | ~0.0.2 | package.json |
| npm | deep-equal | 0.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | bluebird | ^2.2.2 | package.json |
| npm | stellar-lib | ~0.10.3 | package.json |
| npm | unirest | * | package.json |
All dependencies 16
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | async | ~0.9.0 | direct |
| npm | bluebird | ^2.2.2 | direct |
| npm | deep-equal | 0.0.0 | direct |
| npm | extend | ~1.2.0 | direct |
| npm | simple-jsonrpc | ~0.0.2 | direct |
| npm | stellar-lib | ~0.10.3 | direct |
| npm | unirest | * | direct |
| Maven | junit:junit | 4.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.easymock:easymock | 2.2 | indirect |
| Maven | org.easymock:easymockclassextension | 2.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | BigInt | ~5.4.5 | indirect |
| npm | coffee-script | ~1.6.3 | indirect |
| npm | mocha | ~1.13.0 | indirect |
| npm | superagent | * | indirect |
| PyPI | setuptools | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 0
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 4 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.