Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 02:11 UTC

ston-fi / ton-rs

Rust libraries for working with the TON blockchain: cells, TLB, addresses, wallets, contracts, and tonlibjson integration.

RustApache-2.0★ 171 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

ston-fi/ton-rs holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

STON.fiOrganization
3,402 followers26 public repossince May 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioton0.2.64,879320 days agoblockchaincryptothe-open-networkton
crates.ioton_core0.1.46,275230 days agoblockchaincryptothe-open-networkton
crates.ioton_macros0.1.26,2801232 days agoblockchaincryptothe-open-networkton

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 213 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year213
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagton-v0.2.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak
How it's scored
36.2/60Stars — 171 stars
10/25Forks — 17 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks17
stars171
watchers2
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good
How it's scored
56.6/80Monthly downloads — 17,434 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageston, ton_core, ton_macros
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads74,152
monthly_downloads17,434
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.844

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 184/201 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs184
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach — 3,402 followers of ston-fi
18.8/25Track record — 26 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,402
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginston-fi
public_repos26
account_age_days1,534
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 32 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageston, ton_core, ton_macros
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/ton
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/ton
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

29At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28.8/40Legible commit history — 41 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.539
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, crates/ton/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, crates/ton/Cargo.toml, crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml, crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml, examples/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/253 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes72,103
source_files_sampled253
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

171GitHub stars
9contributors
213commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index crates:ton@0.2.6; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 171 ★ / 17 ⇿
171Stars
17Forks
93Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020017116442025-052025-122026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 02:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
7CI-Tests13 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioton_macros—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioton_core—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iotonlib-sys—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iomoka—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-recursion—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iopbkdf2—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioton_liteapi—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioauto_pool—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioadnl—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tower—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iostrum—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-aux—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64-serde—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-retry—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_setters—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastnum—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeverscale-types—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—crates/ton/Cargo.toml
crates.ioton_macros—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitstream-io—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastnum—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitvec—crates/ton_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconvert_case0.11crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeluxe0.5crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.3crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0crates/ton_macros/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioasync-trait—direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.ioconvert_case—direct
crates.iodeluxe—direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.iolibc—direct
crates.iolog—direct
crates.ionum-bigint—direct
crates.ioproc-macro-crate—direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.ioton_core—direct
crates.ioanyhow—indirect
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.iocore_affinity—indirect
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.iolog4rs—indirect
crates.iotokio-test—indirect
crates.ioton—indirect
crates.iotonlib-core—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ston-fi/ton-rs. Read them side by side →

91dyne/ZenroomSecure execution VM executing human-like language (no-code) to operate on data and advanced cryptographic operations.Excellent89solana-foundation/solana-keychainFramework-agnostic Solana transaction signing with multiple backends. Unified trait interface, async-first design, and feature-gated compilation for minimal dependencies.Excellent98iotexproject/iotex-coreOfficial implementation of IoTeX blockchain protocol in Go. An ultra-efficient EVM blockchain offering 1000 TPS with instant 1-block finality. Perfect for DeFi, DePIN tokenomics, Identities, and any trusted logic requiring Web3 composabilityExceptional93vultisig/vultisig-sdkTypeScript SDK for self-custodial multi-chain wallets with MPC security, cross-chain swaps, and AI agent support. 40+ blockchains, no seed phrases.Exceptional92stx-labs/stacks.jsJavaScript libraries for identity, auth, storage and transactions on the Stacks blockchain.Excellent90VeloraDEX/paraswap-sdkVelora allows dApps and traders to get the best DEX liquidity by aggregating multiple markets and offering the best ratesExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.