Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-02 03:32 UTC

strands-rl / strands-env

A unified framework for building agentic RL environments.

PythonApache-2.0★ 62 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#agent-environments#agentic-rl#ai-agents#strands-agents

strands-rl/strands-env holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Strands RLOrganization
20 followers2 public repossince Dec 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIstrands-env0.7.33,211250 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 475 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year475
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv0.7.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak
How it's scored
29/60Stars — 62 stars
9.6/25Forks — 15 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars62
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.8/80Monthly downloads — 3,211 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesstrands-env
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,211
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.932

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 230/276 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs230
open_issues0
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d16
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of strands-rl
5/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginstrands-rl
public_repos2
account_age_days277

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 25 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesstrands-env
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent-environments, agentic-rl, ai-agents, strands-agents
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages167
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 167 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes37,426

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/strands_env/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 34 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/strands_env/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.34
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/strands_env/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/149 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes26,169
source_files_sampled149
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

62GitHub stars
9contributors
475commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:strands-env@0.7.3; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151512026-022026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 6Patch 14
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-02 03:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIstrands-sglang>=0.6.2pyproject.toml
PyPIstrands-agents>=1.46.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai—pyproject.toml
PyPIdatasets—pyproject.toml
PyPImath-verify>=0.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm>=4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv—pyproject.toml
PyPIaiolimiter>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 169

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 158 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiolimiter1.3.0direct
PyPIcachetools7.2.0direct
PyPIclick8.5.0direct
PyPIdatasets5.0.1direct
PyPImath-verify0.9.0direct
PyPIopenai2.54.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3direct
PyPIstrands-agents1.52.0direct
PyPIstrands-sglang0.6.2direct
PyPItiktoken0.14.0direct
PyPItqdm4.70.1direct
PyPIagent-world-model0.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIantlr4-python3-runtime4.13.2indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIaws-bedrock-token-generator1.1.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.74indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.74indirect
PyPIbracex3.0.1indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdeprecation2.1.0indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdirhash0.5.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdockerfile-parse2.0.1indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIe2b2.25.1indirect
PyPIfastapi0.141.1indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIharbor0.23.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.28.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlatex2sympy2-extended1.11.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlitellm1.97.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImcp1.29.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.19indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-threading0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.65b0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpostgrest2.31.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpybase641.5.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIrealtime2.31.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.8indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIscantree0.0.4indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIshortuuid1.0.13indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.8indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPIstorage32.31.0indirect
PyPIstrands-env—indirect
PyPIstrenum0.4.15indirect
PyPIsupabase2.31.0indirect
PyPIsupabase-auth2.31.0indirect
PyPIsupabase-functions2.31.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItau2—indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItransformers5.15.1indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItyper0.27.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.13indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcmatch10.2.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIwrapt2.3.0indirect
PyPIxxhash4.0.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 167 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with strands-rl/strands-env. Read them side by side →

97strands-agents/harness-sdkBuild an agent harness and control it end-to-end. Open-source SDK for production AI agents in Python & TypeScript - any model, any cloud.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99google/adk-pythonAn open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional99crewAIInc/crewAIFramework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous AI agents. By fostering collaborative intelligence, CrewAI empowers agents to work together seamlessly, tackling complex tasks.Exceptional98strands-agents/toolsA set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.