Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 16:17 UTC

streamingfast / substreams-ethereum

Substreams development kit for Ethereum chains, contains Firehose Block model and helpers as well as utilities for Ethereum ABI encoding/decoding.

RustApache-2.0★ 23 stars⑂ 8 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗

streamingfast/substreams-ethereum holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StreamingFastOrganization · verified domain
178 followers309 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume32 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases45 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~77.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv0.12.0-beta.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases77.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.8/60Stars23 stars
7/25Forks8 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars23
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60/80Monthly downloads31,843 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessubstreams-ethereum-core, substreams-ethereum-abigen, substreams-ethereum-derive, substreams-ethereum
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads782,046
monthly_downloads31,843
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.447
How it's scored
22.9/42Issue resolution55% of issues closed
23.3/30PR acceptance21/27 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs21
open_issues5
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.545
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.2/25Owner reach178 followers of streamingfast
24.3/25Track record309 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers178
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginstreamingfast
public_repos309
account_age_days2,062

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history45 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessubstreams-ethereum-core, substreams-ethereum-abigen, substreams-ethereum-derive, substreams-ethereum
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://substreams.streamingfast.io/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://substreams.streamingfast.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
12/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: rustix 0.38.10 (moderate 6.5)
34.4/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,065 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages135
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the crates:substreams-ethereum@0.11.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 135 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.6/40Legible commit history18 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.18
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, abigen-tests/Cargo.toml, abigen/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, abigen-tests/Cargo.toml, abigen/Cargo.toml, core/Cargo.toml, derive/Cargo.toml, substreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
43.7/55Manageable file sizes7/34 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes467,372
source_files_sampled34
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

23GitHub stars
15contributors
32commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
45releases
2bus factor
5open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'substreams-ethereum-abigen-tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812022-072023-072024-06
Major 0Minor 8Patch 17

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 16:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.3abigen-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2.15abigen-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreamsabigen-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereumabigen-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.4abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha30.10abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn1.0.95abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.2abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.7abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettyplease0.1abigen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereum-coreabigen/Cargo.toml
crates.iobuffa0.9core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobuffa-types0.9core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreamscore/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint0.4core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobigdecimal0.3core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.4derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn1.0.13derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.2derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.7derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint0.4derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereum-abigenderive/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.3substreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreamssubstreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereum-abigensubstreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereum-derivesubstreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubstreams-ethereum-coresubstreams-ethereum/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 2 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhowdirect
crates.iobigdecimaldirect
crates.iobuffadirect
crates.iobuffa-typesdirect
crates.ioheckdirect
crates.iohexdirect
crates.ionum-bigintdirect
crates.ionum-traitsdirect
crates.ioprettypleasedirect
crates.ioproc-macro2direct
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.iosha3direct
crates.iosyndirect
crates.ioethabiindirect
crates.iopretty_assertionsindirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:substreams-ethereum@0.11.1 pulls in 135 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rustix0.38.10indirectmoderate10.38.19

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.