Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:41 UTC

structured-world / structured-zstd

Pure Rust zstd implementation (fork of ruzstd). Dictionary compression, no FFI. For coordinode-lsm-tree and CoordiNode.

RustApache-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Mar 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

structured-world/structured-zstd holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

2 followers27 public repossince Aug 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iostructured-zstd0.0.494,6184840 days agocompressiondecompressionpure-rustzstandardzstd

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume307 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year307
human_commit_share0.75
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases47 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv0.0.49
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars8
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.9/80Monthly downloads4,618 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesstructured-zstd
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads15,514
monthly_downloads4,618
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 58% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth24 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.578
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance299/322 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs299
open_issues14
closed_issues126
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.9
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach2 followers of structured-world
12.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginstructured-world
public_repos27
account_age_days364

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history48 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesstructured-zstd
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/structured-zstd
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscompression, pure-rust, rust, zstd, no-ffi
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/structured-zstd
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:structured-zstd@0.0.49 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history75 of 75 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,982
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, c-api/Cargo.toml, cli/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingzstd-wasm/npm/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configszstd-wasm/npm/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, c-api/Cargo.toml, cli/Cargo.toml, ffi-bench/Cargo.toml, zstd-wasm/Cargo.toml, zstd/Cargo.toml, zstd/fuzz/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
50.9/55Manageable file sizes20/270 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes193,588
source_files_sampled270
oversized_source_files20
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
24contributors
307commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
47releases
1bus factor
14open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch crates package 'structured-zstd-cli' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'structured-zstd-c' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ffi-bench' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'structured-zstd-wasm' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-042026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 30
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 14:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iocodec0.0c-api/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.6.0cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iocolor-eyre0.6.5cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.44cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.18.4cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-indicatif0.3.14cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole0.16.3cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iostructured-zstd0.0cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iostructured-zstd0.0ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd0.13.3ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iocriterion0.8ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iodhat0.3ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iozrip0.7ffi-bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2zstd-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iostructured-zstd0zstd-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iotwox-hash2.0zstd/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastrand2.3.0zstd/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section1.2zstd/Cargo.toml
crates.iocompiler_builtins0.1.2zstd/Cargo.toml
crates.iocore1.0.0zstd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloc1.0.0zstd/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.iocolor-eyredirect
crates.iocompiler_builtinsdirect
crates.ioconsoledirect
crates.iocriteriondirect
crates.iocritical-sectiondirect
crates.iodhatdirect
crates.iofastranddirect
crates.ioindicatifdirect
crates.ioranddirect
crates.iostructured-zstddirect
crates.iotracingdirect
crates.iotracing-indicatifdirect
crates.iotracing-subscriberdirect
crates.iotwox-hashdirect
crates.iowasm-bindgendirect
crates.iozripdirect
crates.iozstddirect
crates.iorustc-std-workspace-allocindirect
crates.iorustc-std-workspace-coreindirect
npm@bokuweb/zstd-wasm0.0.24indirect
npm@types/node22.19.20indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmwasm-feature-detect1.8.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:structured-zstd@0.0.49 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.