Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-16 01:54 UTC

superdesigndev / treg

OpenRouter for agent tools. Join community here: https://discord.gg/6mQYYfFMAn

Python · HTMLCustom license★ 5,325 stars⑂ 433 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

superdesigndev/treg holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (82/100) and lowest on Vitality (45/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SuperdesignOrganization
185 followers9 public repossince Jun 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPItools-registry0.26.08,377320 days agoagentsapiclicredentialsproxyregistrysecretstools

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 3,248 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year3,248
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,325 stars
22/25Forks — 433 forks
6.5/15Watchers — 16 watchers
Inputs used
forks433
stars5,325
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
52.3/80Monthly downloads — 8,377 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestools-registry
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads8,377
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.376
How it's scored
12.3/42Issue resolution — 29% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance — 759/851 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs759
open_issues17
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d55
prs_decided_7d59
prs_merged_30d55
prs_decided_30d59
issue_closed_ratio0.292
closed_unmerged_prs92
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.3/25Owner reach — 185 followers of superdesigndev
9.9/25Track record — 9 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers185
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsuperdesigndev
public_repos9
account_age_days482

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 32 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestools-registry
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://treg.to
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdsh-plugin, agents, api-keys, cli, credentials, developer-tools, mcp, proxy, python, registry, secrets
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://treg.to
docs_sitehttps://treg.to
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories55
affected_packages8
assessed_packages181
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 6
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 181 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.87
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes17,409
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
52.3/55Manageable file sizes — 36/737 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes451,504
source_files_sampled737
oversized_source_files36
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — tests/snapshots/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filestests/snapshots/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of—

Key facts

5,325GitHub stars
13contributors
3,248commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
17open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'treg-dsh' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:tools-registry@0.26.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 433 ⇿
0Stars
433Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500433232026-072026-082026-10
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-16 01:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@fontsource-variable/geist5.3.0frontend/package.json
npm@fontsource/dm-mono5.3.0frontend/package.json
npm@fontsource/geist-pixel5.3.0frontend/package.json
npm@lobehub/icons-static-svg1.95.1frontend/package.json
npmmatter-js0.20.0frontend/package.json
npmvue3.5.41frontend/package.json
PyPIhttpx>=0.27pyproject.toml
PyPIposthog>=7.47.3pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary>=2.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@fontsource-variable/geist5.3.0direct
npm@fontsource/dm-mono5.3.0direct
npm@fontsource/geist-pixel5.3.0direct
npm@lobehub/icons-static-svg1.95.1direct
npmmatter-js0.20.0direct
npmvue3.5.41direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIposthog7.47.3direct
PyPIquestionary2.1.1direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.9indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.150.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.63.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.9indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/matter-js0.20.2indirect
npm@types/node26.6.2indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker5.0.1indirect
npm@vitest/spy5.0.1indirect
npm@volar/language-core2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/source-map2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/typescript2.4.28indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/language-core3.3.11indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.41indirect
npmalien-signals3.2.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagic-string1.4.1indirect
npmmuggle-string0.4.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.19indirect
npmobug2.2.1indirect
npmpath-browserify1.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmplaywright1.63.0indirect
npmplaywright-core1.63.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmrolldown1.2.9indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmtinybench6.1.4indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types8.9.0indirect
npmvite8.3.0indirect
npmvitest5.0.1indirect
npmvscode-uri3.2.0indirect
npmvue-tsc3.3.11indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIalembic1.16.5indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.1indirect
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.138.2indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.3indirect
PyPIgrimp3.15indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimport-linter2.13indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImako1.3.10indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImcp2.0.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.0.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.3indirect
PyPIobstore0.11.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIplaywright1.62.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIquickjs1.19.4indirect
PyPIredis8.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51indirect
PyPIsqlmodel0.0.44indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.8indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIstripe15.4.0indirect
PyPItools-registry0.26.0indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.49.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 181 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyio4.14.1indirectcritical64.14.2
pyjwt2.13.0indirectcritical282.15.0
@vue/server-renderer3.5.41indirecthigh13.6.0-rc.6
httpx22.10.0indirecthigh62.12.0
mako1.3.10indirecthigh61.4.2
mcp2.0.0indirecthigh12.2.0
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2
urllib32.7.0indirecthigh62.8.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.