sutras/cosey holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (36/100). It was last updated 55 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
48
overall / 100
Weak
Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25
Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40
No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
source
osv
advisories
0
affected_packages
0
assessed_packages
2
unassessed_packages
100
affected_by_severity
none
direct_affected_packages
0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 2 resolved dependencies against OSV. 100 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20
MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40
Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
examples
has_mcp_signal
no
api_schema_files
—
interfaces_expected_of
—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
16GitHub stars
1contributors
195commits, last 12 months
55days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
deps.dev does not index npm:cosey@0.12.7; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
More detail
Star and fork history 16 ★ / 2 ⇿
16Stars
2Forks
6Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 1Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 08:40 UTC
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 88 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
Registry
Package
Version
Relation
npm
@casl/ability
^6.7.3
direct
npm
@casl/vue
^2.2.2
direct
npm
@cosey/icons
^0.1.8
direct
npm
@cosey/mock
^0.1.6
direct
npm
@gunny/mock
^1.2.0
direct
npm
@iconify-json/carbon
^1.2.8
direct
npm
@tailwindcss/vite
^4.0.9
direct
npm
axios
^1.7.9
direct
npm
dayjs
^1.11.13
direct
npm
element-plus
^2.11.4
direct
npm
lodash-es
^4.17.21
direct
npm
vue
^3.5.21
direct
npm
vue-i18n
^11.1.10
direct
npm
vue-router
^4.5.0
direct
npm
@babel/core
^7.27.1
indirect
npm
@commitlint/cli
^19.6.0
indirect
npm
@commitlint/config-conventional
^19.6.0
indirect
npm
@commitlint/prompt-cli
^19.6.0
indirect
npm
@ctrl/tinycolor
^4.1.0
indirect
npm
@element-plus/icons-vue
^2.3.1
indirect
npm
@emotion/hash
^0.9.2
indirect
npm
@emotion/unitless
^0.10.0
indirect
npm
@eslint/compat
^1.2.9
indirect
npm
@eslint/js
^9.27.0
indirect
npm
@floating-ui/dom
^1.6.13
indirect
npm
@gunny/persist
^1.0.3
indirect
npm
@iconify/types
^2.0.0
indirect
npm
@rollup/plugin-json
^6.1.0
indirect
npm
@types/babel__core
^7.20.5
indirect
npm
@types/conventional-changelog
^6.0.0
indirect
npm
@types/crypto-js
^4.2.2
indirect
npm
@types/fs-extra
^11.0.4
indirect
npm
@types/gh-pages
^6.1.0
indirect
npm
@types/identicon.js
^2.3.5
indirect
npm
@types/inquirer
^9.0.7
indirect
npm
@types/is-hotkey
^0.1.10
indirect
npm
@types/lodash-es
^4.17.12
indirect
npm
@types/markdown-it
^14.1.2
indirect
npm
@types/markdown-it-container
^2.0.10
indirect
npm
@types/nprogress
^0.2.3
indirect
npm
@types/prismjs
^1.26.5
indirect
npm
@types/semver
^7.7.0
indirect
npm
@types/shelljs
^0.8.17
indirect
npm
@types/stylis
^4.2.7
indirect
npm
@vitejs/plugin-vue
^5.2.1
indirect
npm
@vitejs/plugin-vue-jsx
^4.1.1
indirect
npm
@vue/babel-plugin-jsx
^1.4.0
indirect
npm
@vue/runtime-core
^3.5.13
indirect
npm
@vue/shared
^3.5.13
indirect
npm
@vueuse/core
^13.2.0
indirect
npm
ajv
^8.17.1
indirect
npm
classnames
^2.5.1
indirect
npm
consola
^3.3.3
indirect
npm
conventional-changelog
^7.1.1
indirect
npm
cross-env
^7.0.3
indirect
npm
crypto-js
^4.2.0
indirect
npm
csstype
^3.1.3
indirect
npm
dexie
^4.0.11
indirect
npm
echarts
^5.6.0
indirect
npm
esbuild
^0.25.4
indirect
npm
eslint
^9.27.0
indirect
npm
eslint-plugin-vue
^10.1.0
indirect
npm
fs-extra
^11.2.0
indirect
npm
gh-pages
^6.3.0
indirect
npm
glob
^11.0.2
indirect
npm
globals
^16.1.0
indirect
npm
husky
^9.1.7
indirect
npm
identicon.js
^2.3.3
indirect
npm
inquirer
^12.3.0
indirect
npm
is-hotkey
^0.2.0
indirect
npm
jszip
^3.10.1
indirect
npm
katex
^0.16.22
indirect
npm
lint-staged
^15.2.10
indirect
npm
markdown-it
^14.1.0
indirect
npm
markdown-it-container
^4.0.0
indirect
npm
mime
^4.0.7
indirect
npm
nprogress
^0.2.0
indirect
npm
ora
^8.2.0
indirect
npm
pinia
^3.0.2
indirect
npm
prettier
3.4.2
indirect
npm
prettier-plugin-tailwindcss
^0.6.11
indirect
npm
prismjs
^1.30.0
indirect
npm
rimraf
^6.0.1
indirect
npm
rollup
^4.40.2
indirect
npm
sass
^1.82.0
indirect
npm
sass
^1.89.0
indirect
npm
semver
^7.7.1
indirect
npm
shelljs
^0.10.0
indirect
npm
slate-vue3
^0.10.0
indirect
npm
stylis
^4.3.6
indirect
npm
svga
^2.1.1
indirect
npm
tailwindcss
^4.0.9
indirect
npm
tsx
^4.19.2
indirect
npm
typescript
^5.7.2
indirect
npm
typescript-eslint
^8.32.1
indirect
npm
vite
^7.1.7
indirect
npm
vite-plugin-svg-icons
^2.0.1
indirect
npm
vite-plugin-vue-devtools
^8.0.2
indirect
npm
vitepress
2.0.0-alpha.12
indirect
npm
vitepress
^1.6.3
indirect
npm
vitepress-plugin-group-icons
^1.6.1
indirect
npm
vue-tsc
^2.2.8
indirect
Dependency advisories 0
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 2 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 100 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Related records
Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sutras/cosey. Read them side by side →
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
