Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 15:34 UTC

sverweij / watskeburt

get changed files & their statuses since any git revision

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 6 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

sverweij/watskeburt holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (61/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sander VerweijPersonal account

483 followers34 public repossince Jun 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	watskeburt	6.0.0	13,637,432	50	72 days ago	git diff

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
14.6/18	Commit volume — 41 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	41
human_commit_share	0.85
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 25 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 72 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~62.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	25
latest_release_tag	v6.0.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	72
mean_days_between_releases	62.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical

How it's scored

11.3/60	Stars — 6 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	6
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 13,637,432 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	watskeburt
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	13,637,432
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.5/30	PR acceptance — 64/65 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	64
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.3/25	Owner reach — 483 followers of sverweij
23.2/25	Track record — 34 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	483
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	sverweij
public_repos	34
account_age_days	4,810

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 72 days ago
20/20	Version history — 50 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	watskeburt
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	72

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/watskeburt
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	git, git-diff
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.npmjs.com/package/watskeburt
docs_site	https://www.npmjs.com/package/watskeburt
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	181
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 181 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 69 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.812
agent_instruction_files	.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,132

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.15

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	10,838
source_files_sampled	24
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

6GitHub stars

1contributors

41commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

25releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 2Patch 14

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10

6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 15:34 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@gar/promise-retry	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@istanbuljs/schema	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/config	`10.11.0`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/git	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/map-workspaces	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/name-from-folder	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/package-json	`7.0.5`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/promise-spawn	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm64	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-x64	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	@types/istanbul-lib-coverage	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.1`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx-walk	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-loose	`8.5.2`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.5`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	c8	`12.0.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	ci-info	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	clean-pkg-json	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	dependency-cruiser	`18.1.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.2`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	global-directory	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	ini	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	ini	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	interpret	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.2`	indirect
npm	is-installed-globally	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	kleur	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.5.2`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	memorystream	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	nopt	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	npm-install-checks	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	npm-normalize-package-bin	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	npm-normalize-package-bin	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	npm-package-arg	`13.0.2`	indirect
npm	npm-pick-manifest	`11.0.3`	indirect
npm	npm-run-all2	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.75.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	pidtree	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	proc-log	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	prompts	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	read-package-json-fast	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	rechoir	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	regexp-tree	`0.1.27`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.12`	indirect
npm	safe-regex	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	shell-quote	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	sisteransi	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.23`	indirect
npm	string-width	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	test-exclude	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	tsconfig-paths	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	tsconfig-paths-webpack-plugin	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.23.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	upem	`11.0.0`	indirect
npm	v8-to-istanbul	`9.3.0`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-name	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	walk-up-path	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	watskeburt	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	which	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	which	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`18.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`22.0.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 181 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`5.0.8`	indirect	high	1	`5.0.9`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records