Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 00:31 UTC

svg-net / SVG

Fork of the ms svg library

C#MS-PL★ 1,311 stars⑂ 496 forkssince Nov 2011View on GitHub ↗

svg-net/SVG holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (86/100) and lowest on Vitality (58/100). It was last updated 58 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SVG.NETOrganization
16 followers1 public reposince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSvg3.4.8-3557 days agosvgvectorgraphicsrendering

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 58 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
12.4/18Commit volume23 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year23
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push58
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases13 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 58 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~183.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv3.4.8
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release58
mean_days_between_releases183.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

86Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.6/60Stars1,311 stars
22.5/25Forks496 forks
9.7/15Watchers57 watchers
Inputs used
forks496
stars1,311
watchers57
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MS-PL)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
74.2/80Total downloads13,767,095 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSvg
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads13,767,095
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth94 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled94
top_contributor_share0.299
How it's scored
33.2/42Issue resolution79% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance490/563 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs490
open_issues119
closed_issues451
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.791
closed_unmerged_prs73
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.8/25Owner reach16 followers of svg-net
14.2/25Track record1 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers16
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsvg-net
public_repos1
account_age_days2,495

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 57 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSvg
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests24 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://svg-net.github.io/SVG/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssvg, c-sharp, nuget, vector-graphics, dom, css
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://svg-net.github.io/SVG/
docs_sitehttp://svg-net.github.io/SVG/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests24 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.8/40Legible commit history61 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.709
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapGenerators/Svg.Generators.csproj, Samples/Entities/Entities.csproj, Samples/SVGBuilder/SVGBuilder.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsGenerators/Svg.Generators.csproj, Samples/Entities/Entities.csproj, Samples/SVGBuilder/SVGBuilder.csproj, Samples/SVGViewer/SVGViewer.csproj, Samples/SvgConsole/SvgConsole.csproj, Samples/SvgRuntimeUpdates/SvgRuntimeUpdates.csproj, Source/Svg.csproj, Tests/Svg.Benchmark/Svg.Benchmark.csproj, Tests/Svg.Custom/Svg.Custom.csproj, Tests/Svg.Tests.Common/Svg.Tests.Common.csproj, Tests/Svg.UnitTests/Svg.UnitTests.csproj, Tests/SvgW3CTestRunner/SvgW3CTestRunner.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/358 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes46,822
source_files_sampled358
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,311GitHub stars
94contributors
23commits, last 12 months
58days since last push
13releases
2bus factor
119open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 496 ⇿
0Stars
496Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050048062013-062020-012026-09
Major 0Minor 3Patch 10

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 00:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests24 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 11/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.8.0Generators/Svg.Generators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4Generators/Svg.Generators.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetruntime.osx.10.10-x64.CoreCompat.System.Drawing5.8.64Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetruntime.osx.10.10-x64.CoreCompat.System.Drawing5.8.64Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetExCSS4.2.3Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning3.3.37Source/Svg.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.0.0Source/Svg.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetExCSS4.2.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.4.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.8.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.0.0direct
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning3.3.37direct
NuGetruntime.osx.10.10-x64.CoreCompat.System.Drawing5.8.64direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3direct
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.5indirect
NuGetFizzler1.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.16.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3.13.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.17.0indirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLine2.0.0-beta1.20104.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions5.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.